Saturday, July 6, 2013
Stop Deceiving the PUBLIC. Disease ~ ALL Disease is Curable. Read, Study, Learn. "You can't keep one disease and heal two others - when the body heals, it heals everything" ~ Charlott Gerson. The Medical System creates so many different diseases and labels, then a NEW drug for Each, however a Body that is WELL can fight ALL Diseases without Labels.
Friday, July 5, 2013
THIS is HUGE for Free Speech. Online Advice is a Free Speech Issue. You have a right to information and to get advice on Alternative Medicine from those who have been through the process.
"The three-judge appellate panel — which included retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor — disagreed. It held that advice — even advice that falls under the umbrella of occupational licensing — is constitutionally protected speech, and that Cooksey suffered a First Amendment injury."
"The three-judge appellate panel — which included retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor — disagreed. It held that advice — even advice that falls under the umbrella of occupational licensing — is constitutionally protected speech, and that Cooksey suffered a First Amendment injury.
They sent the case back to the trial court and ordered that it be re-analyzed under a First Amendment framework. (See a PDF of the opinion here.)
“This decision will help ensure that the courthouse doors remain open to speakers whose rights are threatened by overreaching government,” said institute Senior Attorney Jeff Rowes. “In America, citizens don’t have to wait until they are fined or thrown in jail before they are allowed to challenge government action that chills their speech.”
In their opinion, the appellate judges wrote that they had “no trouble deciding that Cooksey’s speech was sufficiently chilled by the actions of the State Board.”
It dismissed the board’s argument that its review of Cooksey’s website did not chill his speech, noting that the “red-pen markup of his website from the State Board Complaint Committee … surely triggered the same trepidation we have all experienced upon receiving such markings on a high school term paper.”
Free speech vs. occupational licensing
“This is a decisive, pivotal decision in Steve Cooksey’s favor,” Rowes said. “It will be an important precedent not just in his case, but for cases all over the country where licensing boards are trying to censor people’s advice.”
Coburn’s new decision will have to be based on the principle that advice is speech protected by the First Amendment, Rowes said. “That drastically changes things.”
“The state can now argue, ‘it’s true we restricted his speech, but this particular restriction doesn’t violate the First Amendment for reasons A, B and C,’” Rowes said. “What [it] can’t say at this point is that this is not a First Amendment case.”
Rowes said the state might argue that it has a legitimate interest in restricting Cooksey’s speech to protect public health, as it did the first time around, saying Cooksey’s “target audience is a uniquely vulnerable population that suffers from the chronic and life-threatening condition of diabetes and often struggles to control blood sugar levels,” and that his advice could have “potentially serious health implications.”
“We will argue that speech in this context gets a very, very high degree of protection, and it should be almost impossible for Steve Cooksey to lose, because they are censoring his speech on the basis of its content,” Rowes said.
“They’re saying what you have written on the Internet, those words are illegal because of their meaning,” he said. “That is content-based censorship, and it is virtually a per se violation of the First Amendment.”
“That’s why the state struggled so hard to keep this out of the First Amendment box,” he added.
Rowes said telling someone what food to buy at the grocery store is “not the equivalent of telling him to open his mouth and drilling his teeth out.”
“Nobody doubts the government has the traditional power to regulate the drilling of teeth or installing of pipes,” he said, but what it can’t do is regulate ‘occupational conduct’ that consists solely of a message. “That’s not conduct, that’s speech.”
Rowes said the Supreme Court has held that other occupational advice, such as legal advice, is a form of protected speech. Occupational licensing laws regulating occupations such as law, psychological counseling, investment advising, etc., must conform to the First Amendment, he said.
The specific question Cooksey’s case will answer “is whether one-on-one advice is going to be a well-protected or ignored form of speech and that has dramatic implications for people across the country, because there are lots of occupations that consist mainly of speech.”
“There are millions of people who exchange advice, both for money and for free, both as amateurs and professionals, over the Internet,” Rowes said. “This case ultimately will be an important benchmark for determining whether the kind of advice people have been sharing since the advent of language — about parenting, marriage, relationships, you name it — is going to be a protected form of speech or whether the government can regulate and censor it.”
Rowes said Cooksey’s case could still end up in the Supreme Court, although it might bounce back and forth a few times between the trial court and appellate court before it does."
Source
http://foodriotradio.com/2013/07/n-c-paleo-diet-blogger-wins-a-round-in-federal-court/
http://www.ij.org/images/pdf_folder/first_amendment/paleo/paleo-4th-opinion.pdf
Folks this is a HUGE for the Alternative Medicine Community, as well as others giving online Advice.
"The three-judge appellate panel — which included retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor — disagreed. It held that advice — even advice that falls under the umbrella of occupational licensing — is constitutionally protected speech, and that Cooksey suffered a First Amendment injury.
They sent the case back to the trial court and ordered that it be re-analyzed under a First Amendment framework. (See a PDF of the opinion here.)
“This decision will help ensure that the courthouse doors remain open to speakers whose rights are threatened by overreaching government,” said institute Senior Attorney Jeff Rowes. “In America, citizens don’t have to wait until they are fined or thrown in jail before they are allowed to challenge government action that chills their speech.”
In their opinion, the appellate judges wrote that they had “no trouble deciding that Cooksey’s speech was sufficiently chilled by the actions of the State Board.”
It dismissed the board’s argument that its review of Cooksey’s website did not chill his speech, noting that the “red-pen markup of his website from the State Board Complaint Committee … surely triggered the same trepidation we have all experienced upon receiving such markings on a high school term paper.”
Free speech vs. occupational licensing
“This is a decisive, pivotal decision in Steve Cooksey’s favor,” Rowes said. “It will be an important precedent not just in his case, but for cases all over the country where licensing boards are trying to censor people’s advice.”
Coburn’s new decision will have to be based on the principle that advice is speech protected by the First Amendment, Rowes said. “That drastically changes things.”
“The state can now argue, ‘it’s true we restricted his speech, but this particular restriction doesn’t violate the First Amendment for reasons A, B and C,’” Rowes said. “What [it] can’t say at this point is that this is not a First Amendment case.”
Rowes said the state might argue that it has a legitimate interest in restricting Cooksey’s speech to protect public health, as it did the first time around, saying Cooksey’s “target audience is a uniquely vulnerable population that suffers from the chronic and life-threatening condition of diabetes and often struggles to control blood sugar levels,” and that his advice could have “potentially serious health implications.”
“We will argue that speech in this context gets a very, very high degree of protection, and it should be almost impossible for Steve Cooksey to lose, because they are censoring his speech on the basis of its content,” Rowes said.
“They’re saying what you have written on the Internet, those words are illegal because of their meaning,” he said. “That is content-based censorship, and it is virtually a per se violation of the First Amendment.”
“That’s why the state struggled so hard to keep this out of the First Amendment box,” he added.
Rowes said telling someone what food to buy at the grocery store is “not the equivalent of telling him to open his mouth and drilling his teeth out.”
“Nobody doubts the government has the traditional power to regulate the drilling of teeth or installing of pipes,” he said, but what it can’t do is regulate ‘occupational conduct’ that consists solely of a message. “That’s not conduct, that’s speech.”
Rowes said the Supreme Court has held that other occupational advice, such as legal advice, is a form of protected speech. Occupational licensing laws regulating occupations such as law, psychological counseling, investment advising, etc., must conform to the First Amendment, he said.
The specific question Cooksey’s case will answer “is whether one-on-one advice is going to be a well-protected or ignored form of speech and that has dramatic implications for people across the country, because there are lots of occupations that consist mainly of speech.”
“There are millions of people who exchange advice, both for money and for free, both as amateurs and professionals, over the Internet,” Rowes said. “This case ultimately will be an important benchmark for determining whether the kind of advice people have been sharing since the advent of language — about parenting, marriage, relationships, you name it — is going to be a protected form of speech or whether the government can regulate and censor it.”
Rowes said Cooksey’s case could still end up in the Supreme Court, although it might bounce back and forth a few times between the trial court and appellate court before it does."
Source
http://foodriotradio.com/2013/07/n-c-paleo-diet-blogger-wins-a-round-in-federal-court/
http://www.ij.org/images/pdf_folder/first_amendment/paleo/paleo-4th-opinion.pdf
Folks this is a HUGE for the Alternative Medicine Community, as well as others giving online Advice.
Monday, July 1, 2013
Productive Philip Falcone. Seems to be involved in a lot of screwing over those who work for him and not acting of honoring in Deals. Scam, Fraud, SEC Scandals, Bankruptcy Scandals, and seemingly a never ending array of using other peoples money PRODUCTIVELY aKa Using Investors Money to screw people over, hide money for himself off shore and make his own life better. Meanwhile LYING to those who makes deals and promises to that are just not as PRODUCTIVE as Philip Falcone.
Philip "Falcone-Backed Vietnam Casino Developer Is Sued by CEO"
"Asian Coast Development (Canada) Ltd., a company backed by Philip Falcone’s Harbinger Capital Partners LLC that’s building the first Las Vegas-style casino in Vietnam, was sued by its chief executive officer for breach of contract.
Nathan, a former president of MGM Mirage Global Gaming Development, was hired in April 2010 by Vancouver-based Asian Coast, which has a 50-year license to build a $4.2 billion casino and resort 130 kilometers (80 miles) from Ho Chi Minh City.
Nathan yesterday sued the company, Chairman Robert Wolfe, Falcone and Anthony Sanfilippo, CEO of Pinnacle Entertainment Inc., which has a 23 percent stake in Asian Coast, according to the New York State Supreme Court complaint.
Nathan says Asian Coast induced him to stay on as CEO after he tried to resign in October to obtain an “investment certificate” from the Vietnamese government that included a gaming license. The company then told him he had engaged in conduct that was grounds for termination and last month placed him on administrative leave, he said in the complaint.
“By placing Nathan on so-called ‘administrative leave’ as of April 5, 2013, without any basis for doing so,” the defendants showed that they “only induced him to stay long enough to benefit from his ability to obtain the investment certificate and to avoid a management change that might prejudice the application to amend the investment certificate,” Nathan said in the suit.
Falcone, Spokesman
Falcone didn’t immediately respond to an e-mail seeking comment on the lawsuit, and Steven Goldberg, a spokesman for Falcone with RLM Finsbury in New York, didn’t immediately reply to a telephone message and an e-mail.
Asian Coast and Kerry Andersen, a Las Vegas-based Pinnacle representative, didn’t immediately respond to voice-mail messages seeking comment on the suit.
The case is Nathan v. Asian Coast Development (Canada) Ltd. (ACDZ), 651774/2013, New York State Supreme Court, New York County (Manhattan)."
Source of Philip Falcone Harbinger Post
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-17/falcone-backed-vietnam-casino-developer-is-sued-by-ceo.html
Where there is someone screwed over and there is Philip Falcone of Harbinger Capital being PRODUCTIVE as taking their money and investing it in BAD deals to create more money for his personal Merrill Lynch account, meanwhile all of us who are NOT Productive, we simply get to be the collateral damage to Philip Falcone's lifestyle.
"Asian Coast Development (Canada) Ltd., a company backed by Philip Falcone’s Harbinger Capital Partners LLC that’s building the first Las Vegas-style casino in Vietnam, was sued by its chief executive officer for breach of contract.
Nathan, a former president of MGM Mirage Global Gaming Development, was hired in April 2010 by Vancouver-based Asian Coast, which has a 50-year license to build a $4.2 billion casino and resort 130 kilometers (80 miles) from Ho Chi Minh City.
Nathan yesterday sued the company, Chairman Robert Wolfe, Falcone and Anthony Sanfilippo, CEO of Pinnacle Entertainment Inc., which has a 23 percent stake in Asian Coast, according to the New York State Supreme Court complaint.
Nathan says Asian Coast induced him to stay on as CEO after he tried to resign in October to obtain an “investment certificate” from the Vietnamese government that included a gaming license. The company then told him he had engaged in conduct that was grounds for termination and last month placed him on administrative leave, he said in the complaint.
“By placing Nathan on so-called ‘administrative leave’ as of April 5, 2013, without any basis for doing so,” the defendants showed that they “only induced him to stay long enough to benefit from his ability to obtain the investment certificate and to avoid a management change that might prejudice the application to amend the investment certificate,” Nathan said in the suit.
Falcone, Spokesman
Falcone didn’t immediately respond to an e-mail seeking comment on the lawsuit, and Steven Goldberg, a spokesman for Falcone with RLM Finsbury in New York, didn’t immediately reply to a telephone message and an e-mail.
Asian Coast and Kerry Andersen, a Las Vegas-based Pinnacle representative, didn’t immediately respond to voice-mail messages seeking comment on the suit.
The case is Nathan v. Asian Coast Development (Canada) Ltd. (ACDZ), 651774/2013, New York State Supreme Court, New York County (Manhattan)."
Source of Philip Falcone Harbinger Post
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-17/falcone-backed-vietnam-casino-developer-is-sued-by-ceo.html
Where there is someone screwed over and there is Philip Falcone of Harbinger Capital being PRODUCTIVE as taking their money and investing it in BAD deals to create more money for his personal Merrill Lynch account, meanwhile all of us who are NOT Productive, we simply get to be the collateral damage to Philip Falcone's lifestyle.
Sunday, June 30, 2013
Porn News Today, Monica Foster aKa Alexandria Melody reports on the Richard Nanula; Nanula-Gate Day 4: Did The Luxury Companion use Nanula to attack HelpUbookHer & Jack Spade? Ari Bass aKa Michael Whiteacre, Sean Tompkins, Prostitution Rings, Porn WikiLeaks, Randazza Legal Group and Marc Randazza AND the Protection of Illegal Escorting Rings.
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Friday, June 28, 2013
Richard Nanula; Nanula-Gate Day 3: Trinity St. Clair, HelpUBookHer, Jack Spade & NuVision Media LLC. Monica Foster Reports, Porn News Today.
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Philip Falcone Regarding Andrew Hamerling's Allegations. "it worked" "take it easy on the FCC" and explaining Spectrum
hrg2023@gmail.com is Philip Falcone
From: "hrg2023@gmail.com" <hrg2023@gmail.com>
To: Crystal L. Cox <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 5:39 AM
Subject: Re: A few requests please....thx
It all worked out great!
Sent from my iPhone
===================================================
I, Investigative Blogger had posted lots of information connecting the Intel CEO and the FCC and all kinds of connections and Philip Falcone called me in the middle of the night to insist that I take it easy on the FCC, and asked me to change my blog posts, and then says it worked.
Obviously years later Verizon and Clearwire over topped Lightsquared and at the HARM and COST of the Wireless Consumer. All these Billionaires in negotiations that end up hurting the consumers. Lightsquared Lost Billions. Deer and Company, Verizon, Clearwire and more are connected to Senator Grassley who pretty much STOPPED Lightsquared which would have been good for consumers. Grassley is connected to WR Grace who is the DEVIL himself, and is NOT a good guy. In the End Lightsquared was ran out and the Consumers pay a huge price in MANY ways.
However, what was Philip Falcone up to with the FCC, who was his connection, what worked to pressure who, as there was preliminary approval. This led to more investor money, 100's of millions more I believe. So what is the real story? Got a Tip? SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
More Coming Soon
Subject: So why do you care whether lighsquared exists?
To: "'Crystal@CrystalCox.com'" <Crystal@CrystalCox.com>
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 3:26 AM
Kind of a strange thing to be passionate about...saving a billionaire from losses. Yippee.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device
--- On Sun, 1/23/11, Andrew Hamerling <andrew.hamerling@jgoldman.net> wrote:
From: Andrew Hamerling <andrew.hamerling@jgoldman.net>
Subject: Re: So why do you care whether lighsquared exists?
To: "'savvybroker@yahoo.com'" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 9:50 AM
No. As I understand it, Lightsquared began building out some market points of presence and suddenly TomTom GPS machines al went haywire and stopped working. This was driven from an improper clearing of the spectrum, which could really do harm to anyone the new Lightsquared essentially interferes with. Can it be overcome? Sure. Will it take lots of time and money to do it properly? Yep.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device
From: Crystal L. Cox [mailto:savvybroker@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:45 PM
To: Andrew Hamerling
Subject: Re: So why do you care whether lighsquared exists?
I am Interested in the Model Of Corruption, how companies are blocked.. and protected such as intel - with so much proof of corruption and they are still in business, I am interested in no monopolies...
Don't you thin there is something fishy about it all?
From: Andrew Hamerling <andrew.hamerling@jgoldman.net>
Subject: Re: So why do you care whether lighsquared exists?
To: "'savvybroker@yahoo.com'" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 10:35 AM
The satellite usage isn't the interference problem--it's the fact that they tried (and phil is desperately trying) to repurpose the spectrum for terrestrial use. Why is this significant? Because Phil knows that the spectrum would be worth 10x more minimum if it could be used for terrestrial. And the fcc wants spectrum to get utilized, so they were all for it--and knew there would be interference--but to what degree no one knew...until now.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device
From: Crystal L. Cox [mailto:savvybroker@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 01:20 PM
To: Andrew Hamerling
Subject: Re: So why do you care whether lighsquared exists?
Who is to blame for NOT looking at this Closer before the Satellite went up?Is there real proof of the "improper clearing of the spectrum" ?Why did this TomTom GPS thing surface After the Market Points? In your opionion.. ?
--- On Sun, 1/23/11, hrg2023@gmail.com <hrg2023@gmail.com> wrote:
From: hrg2023@gmail.com <hrg2023@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: So why do you care whether lighsquared exists?
To: "Crystal L. Cox" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 4:01 PM
You can tell him that the interference issue is very overblown that we have done testing for two years. The gps guys have not though and are shooting first and asking questions later.
Sent from my iPhone
ANDREW HAMERLING Correspondence Today.
--- On Sun, 1/23/11, hrg2023@gmail.com <hrg2023@gmail.com> wrote:
From: hrg2023@gmail.com <hrg2023@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: So why do you care whether lighsquared exists?
To: "Crystal L. Cox" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 8:31 PMI finally saw your comments! I had the alert on the wrong info... Duh...they are great...one point, The fcc is on our side so be nice to them :) we can lay low now and see what comes up...
Sent from my iPad
he has been a telecommunication analyst for years.. you WIN he loses, my guess.. So his interest is in making me discredit you.. when you google him. .and read what he says on blogs and quoted in articles.. he must be heavily invested in the "other guys" so the Truth is not what he is after.. i would love to post any information on those GPS tests.. I am still researching dif. things.. hope your evening is good..take care
Yes but dont ya think that NTIA folks are really the same thing as the FCC and that maybe the FCC is humoring someone.. I mean they stand in your way right.. ?making sure they are not getting paid off with a little jabber cant hurt right? ok i will let up..
From: "hrg2023@gmail.com" <hrg2023@gmail.com>
To: Crystal L. Cox <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 5:39 AM
Subject: Re: A few requests please....thx
It all worked out great!
Sent from my iPhone
--- On Sun, 1/23/11, hrg2023@gmail.com <hrg2023@gmail.com> wrote:
From: hrg2023@gmail.com <hrg2023@gmail.com>
Subject: A few requests please....thx
To: "Crystal L. Cox" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 11:02 PMCan we remove this part of the article of the most recent article and the full article about intel and the CEO. It will tone it down a bit..."seems like Clearwire may be controlling the FCC whom is Suppose to answer to congress, who is suppose to answer to you. If Lightsquared gets their Fair Chance, Consumer Costs Could go down... Competition is a a Good thing RIght? And the FCC is Supposed to "Enforce" the Communications act and enforce non-discrimination Right? So what Connects Clearwire Corp. To members of the FCC - the Department of Commerce? More on that Coming Soon."Also like to remove the following entire piece:SUNDAY, JANUARY 23, 2011
LightSquared initially received FCC Permission - Why the Change of Thinking?
"LightSquared initially received FCC Permission to use its satellite frequencies to deploy a dual-mode satellite-long term evolution (LTE) network, but another government agency has since stepped in its path."Source of Quote
http://blog.connectedplanetonline.com/unfiltered/2011/01/14/lightsquared-faces-roadblock-over-gps-interference/The FCC, Federal Communications Commission, who is supposedly an independent US government agency, directly responsible to CongressWho at the FCC Screwed this up?Who at the FCC is connected to Verizon, Clearwire Corporation, or AT&T?Who at the FCC would just simply let Lightsquared have "permission" if it was not actually something that was researched thoroughly BEFORE the Launch of a Satellite and before Irresponsibly risking Billions of Dollars of Investors, as this Money is NOW gone in some way... as it is certainly NOT Cheap to "Launch a Satellite" AND the Money that the Lightsquared, Harbinger Capital Partners have put intoLightsquared based on this initial "FCC Permission" - well I say that the FCC, their Insurance Carrier or Individuals who Screwed Up ARE financially Liable for Billions on Top of Billions of Investors Money. For they would not have went this far if they did not initially have FCC permission, so What Happened?So the FCC who answers to Congress and "The FCC was established by the Communications Act of 1934 and is charged with regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable. " AND yet they did not do their "homework" before giving "permissions" for investors to SPEND Billions. What does the SEC thing of This? Or do they even care that the FCC has disregarded the Rights of Investors by NOT doing the proper leg work first...The FCC give "Permission" and then when your ALL in, well then ANOTHER Government Agency Steps in and makes up some mumbo jumbo to STOP the Progression of Lightsquared, why? What is the Real Motive? I say it is Pay Offs, Favors Owed... it is Saving Old Money - Saving the Good Ol' Boys - SavingVerizon, Clearwire Corporation, and AT&T. For as soon as Lightsquared gets a foothold, wellVerizon, Clearwire Corporation, and AT&T are No More... they Stand to Lose everything Over Some "new guy" - Philip Falcone with the Moxy to dare to go against them and to dare believe that we actually have a Free market place, when Really we have ... Big MONEY.. Political Pull controlling Government Agencies is what we have. Judges are Bought Off, the SEC has insiders that are Corrupt and land big jobs later such as the Peter Sivere whistle blower case where he exposed over 300 Million in Fraud by JP Morgan and then SEC Investigator, George Demos protected JP Morgan, Exposed and Endangered the Whistleblowerwho then got fired... Click Here for That Story.So Verizon, Clearwire Corporation, and AT&T... along with Goldman Sachs, and Several Government Agencies - Individuals in those Agencies will be named and exposed soon... (Got a Tip?Crystal@CrystalCox.com ) - they ALL are putting up any Road Block they can thing of to FraudulentlySquash LIghtsquared, NOW after Billions have already been invested. They are all making a HUGE deal out of every dollar that Harbinger Capital PartnersLightsquared takes in or LOSES.. it seems thatVerizon, Clearwire Corporation, and AT&T... along with Goldman Sachs are controlling the Mainstream media also to put fear into the investors minds..All this to STOP Free Enterprise, to Control the Flow of Money, and ALL this is Illegal.. Time for a Federal RICO Lawsuit, a Whistleblower Lawsuit, and mass Criminal Complaints as this is Violating Federal Laws and well.. .. the Government and Government Agents SHOULD not be Above the Law and Certainly the Executive at Verizon,Clearwire Corporation, AT&T and Goldman Sachs SHOULD not be above the Law...So SHOULD Lightsquared, Harbinger Capitol Investors SUE the FCC? I think they SHOULD, unless of Course the FCC did their homework and the ... is Simply trying to STOP Lightsquard for their own "Motives" or "Special Interest"Did the the National Telecommunications and Information Association (NTIA) discuss this initial "permission" with the FCCGot a Inside Tip on the CEO's at Verizon, Clearwire Corporation, AT&T and Goldman Sachs as to what they have done to bribe anyone, cover up any crimes, pull favors in, or give favors.. anything they have DONE to interfere with Free Enterprise as a New "Business" tries to Fairly Compete with them in an Extremely Unfair Marketplace?eMail your Tip to meCrystal L. CoxAbout the FCCLots more on ALL this Coming Soon.. Talk about a Mess.. and a Blatant Wall of Corruption to STOP a New Business that might just save us all some BIG Money, as for Me Personally ... Competition with VERIZON is a Good thing.. they dominant to much, charge to much... lock you to contracts constantly.. and Competition is a GOOD THING..http://blog.connectedplanetonline.com/unfiltered/2011/01/14/lightsquared-faces-roadblock-over-gps-interference/Thx, your the best...!!!!!Sent from my iPad
===================================================
I, Investigative Blogger had posted lots of information connecting the Intel CEO and the FCC and all kinds of connections and Philip Falcone called me in the middle of the night to insist that I take it easy on the FCC, and asked me to change my blog posts, and then says it worked.
Obviously years later Verizon and Clearwire over topped Lightsquared and at the HARM and COST of the Wireless Consumer. All these Billionaires in negotiations that end up hurting the consumers. Lightsquared Lost Billions. Deer and Company, Verizon, Clearwire and more are connected to Senator Grassley who pretty much STOPPED Lightsquared which would have been good for consumers. Grassley is connected to WR Grace who is the DEVIL himself, and is NOT a good guy. In the End Lightsquared was ran out and the Consumers pay a huge price in MANY ways.
However, what was Philip Falcone up to with the FCC, who was his connection, what worked to pressure who, as there was preliminary approval. This led to more investor money, 100's of millions more I believe. So what is the real story? Got a Tip? SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
More Coming Soon
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)