Marc J. Randazza Responds to Matthew A. Kaplan, Esq. regarding Glen Beck WIPO Dispute. Get your Hip Waders, YOU will Need Em'

Marc J. Randazza Responds to Glen Beck WIPO
Hmm.. do you see anything possibly hypocritical in all this ?

Marc Randazza sure does not believe I have these same rights. Guess I should hire Marc Randazza to represent me against Marc Randazza, ya I know I am sooo Funny.

Let's take a look at a few things that Attorney Marc Randazza has to say when it comes to Domain Name owners rights in cases that do not involve domain names with the name Marc Randazza in the Domain Name. Ready ?

You may want to have a shovel handy and wear hip waders.

" View 1 states: “The right to criticize does not extend to registering a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to the owner’s registered trademark or conveys an association with the mark.”

View 2 states: “Irrespective of whether the domain name as such connotes criticism, the respondent has a legitimate interest in using the trademark as part of the domain name of a criticism site if the use is fair and non-commercial.”

Naturally, View 2 is the prevailing view of American panelists and panels that apply American law to UDRP proceedings. View 1 seems to be more popular with international panelists and panels that apply European law.

Unfortunately, given that UDRP decisions regularly incorporate international legal principles, this case could be assigned to a foreign panelist or to an American panelist who applies transnational principles. I personally would find it distressing if the panel were to make a decision that completely disregards the U.S. Constitution in favor of a foreign perspective that adopts View 1."

Hmmm.. Ok so Marc Randazza, First Amendment Attorney and self proclaimed Free Speech Advocate files a domain name dispute in a Czech Arbitration Court ( a foreign panelist) and it sure looks to me that Marc Randazza did this in order to go directly AGAINST the U.S. Constitution.

Marc Randazza tries to claim I have made money from his not so famous alleged brand. Yet that is simply not true, I have made no money from that domain name and have in fact lost money. I still own the name now because Marc Randazza had Godaddy lock the name, otherwise I would have sold it for 12 Million Dollars.. maybe if I win the right to keep the name I can sell it to a porn connoisseur ( breath, it's Parody ).

The use of MarcRandazza.com is FAIR and non-commercial and Marc Randazza knows it.. he is grasping at straws to redeem his very bad name .. that he claims is his good name and boy is Marc Randazza lying constantly.

In the Glen Beck Case Marc Randazza says, "I personally would find it distressing if the panel were to make a decision that completely disregards the U.S. Constitution in favor of a foreign perspective that adopts View 1."

YET it's not so distressing when the Constitution is disregarded to protect the ego of whiny baby attorney Marc Randazza.

In the Glen Beck Case Documents, Marc Randazza goes on to say, "To be candid, we found the fact that Mr. Beck filed this action at all to be most puzzling. Although, it was obvious why he did not file in a U.S. court given the law surrounding nominative fair use of trademarks as fully explained in our Brief. Naturally, a defamation claim as alluded to in Mr. Beck’s complaint would be humiliatingly doomed as well in a U.S. court. "

Hmmm.. so Marc Randazza, Hypocritical Attorney finds it puzzling that a man would try and get a domain name with his name in it, yet Marc Randazza sure is not seeming puzzled when the domain name has Marc Randazza in it. Surely a defamation claim would be humiliating to dumb ol' Marc Randazza.

And it all seems so obvious now as to why Marc Randazza did not file in a U.S. Court.

The above document is so Full of Shit, as Marc Randazza seems to be taking the opposite side of it all now... poor baby.. afraid of a girl buying a domain name and has to file a protective order.. IN HIS HOUR OF TERROR !!! ( as Seen on Nationally Syndicated NPR )

Hypocrite Marc Randazza goes on to say, "Accordingly, we found it to be most ironic that Mr. Beck, facing the fact that the U.S. Constitution would stand in his way in a U.S. court, sought to bring this action before an international domain name arbitration panel.

On March 20, 2009, he said on his show:

     Let me tell you something. When you can't win with the people, you
     bump it up to the courts. When you can't win with the courts, you
     bump it up to the international level.

Of course, we levy no critique at Mr. Beck for seeking to vindicate his perceived rights in this forum. We do not share his opinion as articulated on March 30, and we respect his creativity in seeking an alternate avenue where his claims might have a chance of success. Unfortunately, despite the general wisdom among UDRP panelists, we find that occasionally they render decisions that make First Amendment champions cringe."

So is Marc Randazza claiming to be a First Amendment Champion. REALLY ? Is that what your Going with Dipshit ?

Well, Folks Marc Randazza is certainly NOT a First Amendment Champion.

Marc Randazza got a whole lot of my blogs shut down because he did not like me complaining about Marc J. Randazza. Marc Randazza filed a protective order against me.

Marc Randazza threatened me in private emails on making him an enemy. Marc Randazza gathered a lynch mob, lying about my motives and attacked me online, in my my post office mail, my email, and in world wide blogs and forums.

Marc Randazza lied to a Forbes reporter and painted me in false light as if I had attacked a child. Marc Randazza accused me of extortion when Marc Randazza himself offered to buy the domain name and I said NO.

Marc Randazza has been on a rant for nearly a year now just because of a domain name. And all this to suppress my Free Speech rights, my First Amendment rights and in essence has violated the rights of all bloggers and citizens and has so far set some pretty bad precedence.

Marc Randazza is the one that "facing the fact that the U.S. Constitution would stand in his way in a U.S. court, sought to bring this action before an international domain name arbitration panel " .

Marc Randazza wanted to violated my constitutional rights, therefore Marc Randazza brought this "ACTION" before an international domain name arbitration panel. "Of Course" I "Levy no Critique" at Marc Randazza for "seeking to vindicate his perceived rights in this forum".

Marc Randazza, Alleged First Amendment Rights Attorney and Advocate of Free Speech, certainly seems to be making REAL First Amendment Champions, such as myself, CRINGE.

A Few more quotes from the document above as Marc Randazza blathers on, in defense of his client, yet now in a hypocritical rant fights for the exact opposite against Blogger, Super Hero Crystal L. Cox, the "REAL" Free Speech Champion.

"We are certain that despite our disagreement with Mr. Beck’s legal position, that all parties involved hold equal reverence for the First Amendment. Therefore, I have prepared a proposed stipulation that will ensure that no matter which panelist is assigned to this case, the First Amendment will illuminate these proceedings like rays of light from the Torch of Liberty."

Drama, Drama, Drama Queen !!!

"I am certain that neither party wishes to see First Amendment rights subordinated to international trademark principles, thus unwittingly proving Mr. Beck’s point. Lest this case become an example of international law causing damage to the constitutional rights that both of our clients hold dear, I respectfully request that your client agree to stipulate to the application of American constitutional law to this case. "

Don't you throw up a bit when hypocritical, down right EVIL lying lawyers such as Marc John Randazza, sign their Blather and Yammering with "Sincerely," Marc John Randazza

Blah.. Blah.. Blah..

Edgar J. Steele: the North Idaho Edgar J. Steele Story. Congressional Testimony: Cyndi Steele to Bill Windsor of Lawless America regarding Edgar Steele Idaho Attorney Framed by Idaho Corruption.

Cyndi Steele Congressional Testimony Regarding the North Idaho Edgar Steele Story.



".. web site directly addresses the arrest of Edgar J. Steele and his evolving legal battle regarding a “murder-for-hire plot” he is alleged to have undertaken.  Those involved with the content of this site have a keen interest in facts, truth, information gathering and – ultimately – the support and complete exoneration of Mr. Steele leading to a swift release from incarceration.

In the spirit of an America conceived as a Constitutional Republic, endowing free speech and fair, impartial justice upon its citizens, we must all rise from the sidelines to stand with, and for a fellow citizen.  Many believe the America of 2010 – the “great experiment in government” – has run its course and now has devolved into a megalomanical oligarchy, fearful of and abusive to citizens like Mr. Steele. "

Support of North Idaho's Edgar J. Steele

http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Free-Edgar-Steele/108956835840391

"The starting point of concern occurred on June 11, 2010 when Mr. Steele was arrested for suspicion of intent to arrange for the murder of his wife and mother-in-law.  Much of the current knowledge on this case has been gleaned from the print and broadcast media of north Idaho and eastern Washington state.  Aggressive negative bias against Mr. Steele is found in nearly every news report thus far issued. The reader is advised to take general media output with more than a grain of salt."

Source of Edgar J. Steele Information
http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/background/

".. a one-stop location for Edgar’s writings. If installment have been updated by him, they will be posted here. "

http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/complaint/

Edgar J. Steele definitive non-fiction work “Defensive Racism” is now available!  Please visit www.defensiveracism.com "

http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/book/

Free Edgar J. Steele Videos for More Information
http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/ussc/



Idaho Anti-Corruption - Free Edgar Steele



Idaho Free Speech.  Make a Stand Against Corruption in Idaho



Edgar Steele Interview




Free Edgar Steele, Click Here for More Information

Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Gail Mackie of Spokanimal: Correspondence with Lawless America, Gail Mackie of Spokanimal had the Following to say regarding the Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine story.

Gail Mackie of Spokanimal had this to Say to Lawless America regarding the
Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine Story.

"From: gmackie@spokanimal.org
Subject: RE: Animal confiscation
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 06:59:58 -0700

The true parts of the video:

1.       In February we confiscated 50 animals from Erskine’s home
2.       Board is being charged at $20/day for all 4 dogs

What the video did not say:
1.        Cruelty charges have been filed and the animals are being held at Erskine’s request.

2.       Board is allowed at $10/day per animal  ($40)  we are charging $20/day

3.       Erskine has visitation rights whenever she comes in during business hours

4.       We are in the middle of a court case at this time

5.       50 animals were confiscated from her 200 square foot home

6.       Police and media were with us on sited during the confiscation, their reports indicated the stench from the street coming from the house.

7.       Erskine has been investigated or charged before with cruelty and for taking funds from elderly men who were living in her home

8.       Many feral cats were confined to cages in her basement.  Earthen steps going into the basement where there was a single light bulb illuminating the area.  The cages of these cats was about 2-4” deep in feces and urine.  The cats had scald burns on their bellies and paws from laying in urine.

Thanks for giving us the benefit of response.  The few calls we have had rant and rave and then hang up.

Please google Erskine under her name or any of her alias names:

Marsha Erskine
Lavena Erskine
Lavena Dodds
Marsha Dodds"


Let's break this response down a bit, as I find it quite petty in places and a bit "reactive". Meaning I believe that Gail Mackie of Spokanimal is quite defensive and leaving out quite a lot.

So Gail Mackie of Spokanimal admits that Gail Mackie of Spokanimal confiscated 50 animals from the home of Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine.  Yet Gail Mackie of Spokanimal does not seem to mention that Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine had come to Gail Mackie of Spokanimal previously for help with these same animals.

Gail Mackie of Spokanimal also admits to charging $20 a day to board the dogs of  Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine. This is money that those donating to Gail Mackie of Spokanimal are paying out, at least at first until folks like Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine can pay Gail Mackie of Spokanimal for this boarding of their personal pets in which they could be boarding without Gail Mackie of Spokanimal.

Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine tried to help these animals,  Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine  become overloaded and went to Gail Mackie of Spokanimal to get help, to drop off these strays.   Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine was turned away by Gail Mackie of Spokanimal and then soon after, Gail Mackie of Spokanimal sent police and local media to the home of  Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine in order to make a big display of what do gooders Gail Mackie of Spokanimal is. When in truth, Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine had been turned away by Gail Mackie of Spokanimal.

Gail Mackie of Spokanimal claims that the video of the Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine story does not talk about cruelty charges filed. Why in the world would there be cruelty charges filed when Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine came to Gail Mackie of Spokanimal in order to do the right thing by these Spokane stray, feral animals?

Gail Mackie of Spokanimal talks of visitation rights for Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine . This makes no sense, as  Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine should not have had her main pets taken. She needed the massive strays taken, as  Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine tried to get Gail Mackie of Spokanimal to do previously.  Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine certainly did not need her own personal pets taken. This was cruel punishment to  Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine, as she loves her pets very much. They are her family.

Gail Mackie of Spokanimal talks of a court case that "we" are in the middle of.  I will post documents on this "court case" soon.  Gail Mackie of Spokanimal seems to give no details of this case nor admit that Gail Mackie of Spokanimal had refused to do right by these animals in the first place.

In number 6 Gail Mackie of Spokanimal says, "Police and media were with us on sited during the confiscation, their reports indicated the stench from the street coming from the house."

What a dramatic bunch of PR crap that is. Gail Mackie of Spokanimal seems to have called the cops, and why?  Gail Mackie of Spokanimal called the "Media" and ALL to give Kudos to Gail Mackie of Spokanimal which leads to more donations for Gail Mackie of Spokanimal .

Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine come to Gail Mackie of Spokanimal with the issue of these animals in the first place. So does Gail Mackie of Spokanimal have more "Clout" with the Spokane Police then  Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine ?  Well of course Gail Mackie of Spokanimal does. Gail Mackie of Spokanimal is a big deal in Spokane as she is an alleged do gooder helping the stray and distressed animals of Spokane.

Gail Mackie of Spokanimal says media was were with "Us".  Hmmm why is that Gail Mackie of Spokanimal ? My guess is to get more sympathy, pats on the back and donations to Gail Mackie of Spokanimal.

The "Media" certainly did not present Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine's side of the issue. This alleged "Real Media"  just reported that the "stench" was coming from the house. Ummm gee, yep, 50 animals in which Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine tried to get Gail Mackie of Spokanimal to help her with in the first place.

This, so called "Media" simply defamed Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine and made her look like a Crazy Cat Lady, even called her the Cat Lady in their alleged "reputable" "Media", and Why?  Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine is the collateral damage in the sensationalism of newspapers reporting on what they call animal cruelty, as this gets lots of readers online and offline and this sells ongoing ads as so many come back year after year to read stories such as the Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine story and in this they feel for the seeming plight of Gail Mackie of Spokanimal and they send more money to Gail Mackie of Spokanimal.

These readers also tend to subscribe to those media sources who seem to be on the side of the animals, not knowing that the truth is simply NOT being reported.

To this traditional "Media", such as the Spokesman Review, the truth seems to even be irrelevant and there is no accountability to "Media" such as the Spokesman Review who ruin lives such as Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine in their quest to make more MONEY.

In number 7 Gail Mackie of Spokanimal says, "Erskine has been investigated or charged before with cruelty and for taking funds from elderly men who were living in her home".

First of all what in the world does taking funds from an elderly men have to do with this situation? Is Gail Mackie of Spokanimal simply trying to defame Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine ?  Is Gail Mackie of Spokanimal attempting to make Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine   look like a criminal and therefore diminish what Gail Mackie of Spokanimal has done here?

Gail Mackie of Spokanimal simply states that Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine took funds from elderly men. What in the world does that mean?

Did  Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine have elderly men as renters ?  Did Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine sell stuff to these mysterious elderly men?  Did Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine take care of these elderly men or do errands of some kind? And really is it any of our business?  Is it illegal?  If so file a criminal complaint and STOP yammering and blathering lies to discredit Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine on a totally unrelated case.  Seriously Gail Mackie of Spokanimal Play Fair.

Its ok Gail Mackie of Spokanimal, I don't play fair either. I play FACTS.  Not favoritism to big media, elite and money. And not to the way people are dressed or how they choose to live their life.

So continuing, in number 8 Gail Mackie of Spokanimal speaks of feral cats in the basement.  Yes Gail Mackie of Spokanimal, many "feral" cats were in the basement of Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine .

That is because Gail Mackie of Spokanimal refused to take these "feral cats".  See folks, the fact that Gail Mackie of Spokanimal calls the cats "feral" implies that Gail Mackie of Spokanimal knows that the cats were not pets of Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine. And therefore there is no cruelty charges.

Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine simply took in "feral", stray cats that had gone wild, descended from domestic cats in the Spokane area. Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine attempted to help these animals and essentially all of Spokane by getting these animals off the streets and feeding and caring for them to the best of her ability.

Gail Mackie of Spokanimal ends her emailed response to Lawless America by defaming Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine  a bit more in encouraging all of us to google the alleged aliases of  Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine.

Gail Mackie of Spokanimal makes it sound almost criminal to have these alleged 4 different names, she calls Aliases.  See we know her as Marcia Erskine, due to the special report by Lawless America.  Her name is Lavena Marsha Erskine. She obviously goes by Marcia short for Marsha.

She looks to me to be in her 60's, so one can guess she would have at least a maiden name and a married name, if not several in this day and age. So 2 different last names is not so mysterious, not so "Alias" and certainly not something to judge Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine badly on, as seems to be the intention of Gail Mackie of Spokanimal.

For me personally, I stand with the Woman doing her best to make the world a better place for us all.   I choose the side of the woman who has no voice, because Gail Mackie, Spokanimal, the Spokesman Review and the alleged "All Media" of Spokane Washington simply silenced the voice of Marsha Erskine in attempt to twist this story into animal cruelty, when in fact it was and continues to truly be animal rescue by Marsha Erskine.

Gail Mackie, in my opinion, is being very petty with this response and is simply Yammering and Blathering and provided no documented proof.

Spokanimal, Gail Mackie seemed to have turned Marsha Erskine away plain and simple.    Marsha Erskine was trying to do right by these animals and Spokanimal, Gail Mackie did not let her. Then Spokanimal, Gail Mackie turns around and involves police and the alleged "All Media" of Spokane Washington in an attack on the constitutional rights of Marsha Erskine.

Do I think someone should have 50 animals?  No Way. However, I do support Marsha Erskine in trying to do right by this animals and I do know that Spokane Washington needs people like Marcia Erskine to help Spokanimal, Gail Mackie in dealing with strays.

Spokanimal, Gail Mackie punishing this one woman for trying to do right by these animals,  essentially shuts down others who are trying to help strays in Spokane Washington.

Most do not have the time, patience nor stomach to deal with this situation. If folks like  Marsha Erskine, Marcia Erskine do, then we need to support them and demand that non-profits such asSpokanimal, Gail Mackie are non-discriminating in their dealing with the strays of Spokane Washington and those who attempt to help these animals.

Non-profit humane organization such as Spokanimal have certain obligations and accountability to the public. As you are paying the tax that they are not. Gail Mackie has, I believe, worked with Spokanimal since 1983, maybe its time for Gail Mackie to retire.  Meanwhile, it is time for me to dig into over 30 years of records of Spokanimal and see what we can turn up in some investigative blogging. Why? In the name of justice and equality for all.

So You choose the dog you want in this fight based on your own beliefs, your information and how you interpret the facts, findings and the reporting from the "Alleged" "All Media" that showed up on the scene and WOW witnessed alarming smells.

For me, I Choose Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine, one woman who is making a difference, a stand in effort to attempt to help in her way, to deal with a huge issue that many of us simply cannot face nor deal with.

Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine is not a rich woman, not a tax free non profit getting donations from the public for her efforts to help these animals. Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine is simply one of many who help these animals with their own time and money the best they can. And when Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine could not do it, she sought the help of Gail Mackie of Spokanimal and was turned away.  Only to then be humiliated, persecuted and financially punished soon after for taking care of these animals, rejected by Gail Mackie of Spokanimal, on her own the best she could.

Gail Mackie of Spokanimal makes herself look like a superhero calling news and media sources to twist a story to get more money, donations sent to Gail Mackie of Spokanimal and to   keep Gail Mackie of Spokanimal in a job.

Meanwhil Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine and folks like her, are out there every day buying cat food, dog food, helping strays and even spay and neutering animals they have nothing to do with and all this to help best they can. These folks are all around Spokane networking with neighbors to help and they are punished for their efforts by folk like Gail Mackie of Spokanimal.

One of the articles I read talked about 30 years of complaints regarding Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine . Really?  Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine has been taking in strays for 30 years and folks like Gail Mackie of Spokanimal have not helped her, or taken animals, give money to help, anything? They simply attack her, fine her and publish defaming articles regarding her efforts, instead of doing something about the problem of massive strays that she was trying to help.

Stand in Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine's shoes, come from her heart and then rethink your stance on the Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine story.

I intend to dig very deep into the records, in money, out money, fines, and all aspects of Gail Mackie in regards to Spokanimal from the very begining. I will expose every devilish dollar should it exist. This "non-profit" is all of our business. And I have made my choice, I stand with  Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine  and folks like her, I have known many over my life and though I could never do what they do. I am certainly glad that they can do it and that they continue to exist out there.

Many know of the problems with stray animal in Spokane, and they do not have the time nor energy to do anything about it, so they help by donating to Spokanimal, Gail Mackie.  These folks believe in Spokanimal, Gail Mackie and therefore Spokanimal, Gail Mackie must do the right thing and help people like Marcia Erskine that are taking on so much, in order to do right by these animals.

I will EXPOSE Spokanimal and Gail Mackie on every dirty deed I can Find.  eMail your  Spokanimal and Gail Mackie tips to me Crystal L. Cox, investigative blogger at Crystal@CrystalCox.com 

Are you a past employee of Spokanimal and Gail Mackie and have a tip regarding Spokanimal and Gail Mackie ? Email Me.

Do you have information on donations mis-used or any other indescrestions or possible violations of law, code, or non-profit status of Spokanimal and Gail Mackie ? eMail Me.

On a side note, I would say, in my Opinion, that Marcia Erskine, Marsha Erskine could possible sue the Spokesman Review and Gail Mackie Spokanimal for defamation, as in my case they claim I did not get both sides so therefore I am not the real "Media".   I don't see where Marsha Erskine, Marcia Erskine's story in these alleged "Real" news sources, even attempted to give her side. Seems to me that they just painted her in false light, attacked her as some animal cruelty culprit and called it a day. Oh, and then placed ads all around the article to make more money for the Spokanesman Review and get more donations to Spokanimal, Gail Mackie.

Folks like Marsha Erskine, Marcia Erskine may be just a story to sell papers for the Spokesman Review, and a way to get more donations for Gail Mackie and Spokanimal, but to me, folks like Marsha Erskine, Marcia Erskine are the ones out there making the world a better place for all of us, so we don't have to deal with the overload of strays, and face the cries of animals without a home.  We simply donate to a local shelter and call it good. Thing is when those shelters turn away people like Marsha Erskine, Marcia Erskine who is obviously overloaded, this is simply wrong and I for one say they should have their non-profit status revoked as they take in money in fines and boarding when this woman had previously come to Gail Mackie, Spokanimal for help and was cruelly turned away.

Call me Bat Shit Crazy as many of you already do, but I stand firmly with the Crazy ol' Cat Lady, making the world a better place for all of us who do not have time, nor the stomach to do so.

More Information at www.GailMackie.com  (owned by Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, Giving Voice to Victims as the "Real Media" )

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger, Industry Whistleblower
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Oh and P.S. - As Gail Mackie of Spokanimal suggest you Google Marsha Erskine to get the "real" story according to Gail Mackie of Spokanimal.  Well I, Crystal Cox Blogger, suggest that you Google Gail Mackie of Spokanimal and see what you can find.

... much more coming Soon.. Also Check Out Lawless America at the Following Links

http://www.facebook.com/lawlessamerica

http://lawlessamerica.com/

Martin Cain. Dylan Energy. Martin Can Lied to Me and Cheated me out of Money. Martin Cain in my opinion cannot be trusted. Dylan Energy is Martin Cain. Mart Cain, Dylan Energy. Martin T. Cain. Dylan Energy Martin Cain.

Martin Cain. Dylan Energy. Martin Can Lied to Me and Cheated me out of Money.  Martin Cain in my opinion cannot be trusted. Dylan Energy is Martin Cain. Mart Cain, Dylan Energy. Martin T. Cain. Dylan Energy Martin Cain.

Windels, Marx, Lane, Mittendorf Law Firm - David Swerdlow, Craig Gottilla. David Swerdlow and Craig Gottilla of Windels, Marx, Lane, Mittendorf

Email your David Swerdlow and Craig Gottilla of Windels, Marx, Lane, Mittendorf tips to SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com - Whistleblower Media, Crystal L. Cox Investigative Blogger.

Below is a Letter from Eleanor Capogrosso Esq.  regarding David Swerdlow and Craig Gottilla of Windels, Marx, Lane, Mittendorf.


"Hello,

I came across attorneys in  New Jersey, I was wondering  if anyone had knowledge about. The firm's name is Windels, Marx, Lane, Mittendorf.

The attorneys I dealt with were David Swerdlow and Craig Gottilla. I had a case in which they represented the defendant, State Farm Insurance Company in Federal Court in Newark, New Jersey. The case dealt with a non-payment claim of a flood in Jersey City HUD apartment complex.

An issue in the case was the failure of obtaining an building inspection by HUD. The building complex primarily had tenants from India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. It was my strong belief that the C.I.A had placed surveillance into these buildings.

That was the reason why a building inspector could be found. Windels, Marx, Lane, Mittendorf was Bill Casey's, former director of the C.I.A, law firm.

They commuted hours to the court in Newark from Princeton, New Jersey on a very small insurance claim. Their attorney's fees far outweighed the cost of the claim. So I knew this interference on the case had to do with preventing a buiding inspection and the surveillance that would be uncovered.

 During the course of the litigation, these attorneys demonstrated such bad faith. When I tried to obtain the transcript of remarks they made at a settlement conference in front of Hon. Mark Falk, the language was missing from the transcript.

I brought this to the attention of the Chief Judge, Hon. Brown; the day I sent the fax to him notifying him of this, my motion in front Hon. Falk was denied. Hon. Brown sent me a letter indicating that the judge was allowed to alter a transcript when there is a pending motion and oral decision.

When I wrote back to the chief judge explaining that there was no pending motion but only a settlement conference, the Hon. Falk was removed from my case. I made telephone calls to report this to the office of Inspector General of the C.I.A., I tried to explain to them that the brakes in my car were tampered with, my tires were slashed,, I found a listening device in my car and I had received death threats.

They refused to listen to me, so I sent them an email. In response the C.I.A called the local police near my mother's home, which is 25 miles away in another county, telling her that the C.I.A called them because they received an email saying that she was going to kill someone, vandalize a car and kill herself. They also said the email was sent by my elderly mother, under her social security number.

Rather, it was sent by me in a different county 25 miles away. However, I certainly did not write those things in the email. The C.I.A could have traced the IP address clearly to me located in Manhattan, especially since they knew I called three times explaining the matter to them.

 There has been phone tapping wherein my and my family's medical treatment have been interfered with. A family member has been turned away from an emergency room in the process of a stroke. He was was told he did not need medical care. He was also turned away from same emergency room when he had a broken arm.

They are listening in on telephone conversations and know the doctor and hospital we am going to  and interfering with the treatment.

 If anyone knows any information concerning these lawyers or law firm I would appreciate it if you would forward it to me.

Eleanor Capogrosso Esq."


Email your David Swerdlow and Craig Gottilla of Windels, Marx, Lane, Mittendorf tips to SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com - Whistleblower Media, Crystal L. Cox Investigative Blogger.

Aaron Wemple Congressional Testimony: Aaron Wemple to Bill Windsor of Lawless America in Springfield IL Aaron Wemple

Congressional Testimony: Aaron Wemple Part 1



Congressional Testimony: Aaron Wemple to Bill Windsor of Lawless America in Springfield IL Part 2



Congressional Testimony: Aaron Wemple

Click Here for the Bill Windsor Lawless America Site
http://lawlessamerica.com/

Expose Corruption. Start a Blog or a Hundred Blogs. Submit Free Press Releases, Tell your Story in Video and Load to YouTube and other video share blogs. Be your own PR Person. Post documents of proof, evidence, videos of proof. Know one knows your story as well as you, has the documents of proof, and can tell your story like you can. Tell your own story any way you can. And Send me a Link at WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com

Mona Gudbranson Congressional Testimony: Mona Gudbranson to Bill Windsor of Lawless America in Pittsburgh. Mona Gudbranson

Mona Gudbranson Congressional Testimony



Mona Gudbranson Congressional Testimony

Click Here for the Bill Windsor Lawless America Site
http://lawlessamerica.com/

Expose Corruption. Start a Blog or a Hundred Blogs. Submit Free Press Releases, Tell your Story in Video and Load to YouTube and other video share blogs. Be your own PR Person. Post documents of proof, evidence, videos of proof. Know one knows your story as well as you, has the documents of proof, and can tell your story like you can. Tell your own story any way you can. And Send me a Link at WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com