Saturday, January 17, 2015
Plaintiff, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox NOTIFIES Intel Corp., (INTC:NASDAQ GS) (INTC.OQ) (INTC:US) of Massive Shareholder Liability by sending INTC, Intel Corp a Notice of Claim, Notice of Liability Regarding Federal RICO / Racketeering Lawsuit District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF, filed February 26th, 2013 by Plaintiff Crystal Cox. Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach, District Judge James C. Mahan, Las Vegas Nevada.
Plaintiff Blogger Crystal Cox Notice of Claim, Notice of Liability; Defendant INTC, Intel Corp., Douglas Melamed personally and professionally, Steven R. Rodger personally and professionally. RICO / Racketeering Lawsuit, District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF.
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Pro Se Plaintiff
District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
March 6th, 2013
Steven R. Rodgers
Vice President of Legal, Corporate Affairs and
Deputy General Counsel of Litigation, Licensing & Patents, Intel Corporation
Douglas Melamed
Intel Corp. General Counsel
Intel, INTC Shareholders, Auditors, Insurance Providers
Regarding: NOTICE of Liability;
Notice of Claim Regarding Intel Corporation and Possible Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel, INTC Shareholders and Others. Notice to all Intel Executives, Shareholders, Board Members, Insurance Providers, Auditors, and all financially connected to Intel Corp., INTC in any way.
Notice Regarding RICO / Racketeering Complaint Filed in District Of Nevada, Liability to INTC, Intel Shareholders and Intel Executives.
District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF names Douglas Melamed, Steven R. Rodgers and Intel Corp. in conspiracy to STOP the flow of information in online media regarding INTC, Intel’s Involvement in the iViewit Technology Theft.
Douglas Melamed, Steven R. Rodgers and Whom It May Concern:
This notice is written upon the Knowledge and Belief of Investigative Blogger Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox. I, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, write this letter to notify you of legal action pending against Intel, INTC in the District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF Lawsuit, whereby Intel Corp., Douglas Melamed, and Steven R. Rodgers are named Defendants.
Notice was sent to Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation, who is named Personally and Professionally, On December 27th 2012 and again in On January 27th 2013. As well as updated court documents. Notices have also been sent to INTC, Intel Corp. General Counsel Douglas Melamed
Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation have, thus far, ignored this serious legal matter, and it is assumed have failed to notify auditors, shareholders, Intel Ceo’s, and all who should be notified of this massive liability to Intel Corp. and INTC Shareholders.
Upon information and belief, the frauds included but are not limited to the failure of Intel Corp., INTC, to disclose both this lawsuit and the Intellectual Property infringement of the iViewit Technology, which is a Trillion dollar liability to Intel, INTC Shareholders and the Intel Corporation.
Intel Corp., INTC executives have known of this massive liability over violations of NDA’s and infringement of the iViewit Video Technology for over a Decade.
Ex-Senior Vice President, General Counsel of Intel Corp., INTC, Bruce Sewell, now General Counsel of APPLE, who is also named in this Federal RICO Lawsuit. Corresponded with Eliot Bernstein regarding this massive undisclosed liability. I, Crystal Cox have attached those correspondences to this Notice of Liability, as well as added links at the bottom of this letter.
APPLE Executive Steven Dowling has also communicated with Eliot Bernstein of iViewit Technology regarding this massive undisclosed liability.
Eliot Bernstein, founder of iViewit Technology Company, and one of the inventors of the iViewit Video Technology, is named as a Defendant in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, which was filed in alleged conspiracy to suppress Internet Blogs, Domain Names and Online Media reporting on the iViewit Technology theft, which involves Intel Corp., INTC, as noted in the iViewit Technology SEC Complaint, RICO Complaint, FBI Complaints, USPTO Complaint and other Federal Investigations into this matter.
In regard to Eliot Bernstein and the iViewit Technology Company, Intel Corp., INTC has massive, undisclosed liabilities and this notice is to warn all those financially tied to INTC, Intel Corporation of this massive liability. Failing to disclose this liability is in direct violation of various SEC laws and rules including but not limited to FASB No. 5 requirements for disclosing liabilities and more.
The Eliot Bernstein and the iViewit Technology Company, also involves an attempted murder of his family and a car bombing that blew up three vehicles in addition to Bernstein Vehicle.
The iViewit Technology theft is a very serious matter, and a massive, undisclosed liability to Intel, INTC shareholders, auditors, and executives. The iViewit Technology theft involves high stakes corporate theft and fraud of a 13 Trillion Dollar Intellectual Property.
Notably, federal Judge Shira Scheindlin referred to the iViewit Case as a case involving Murder that has also been marked as legally “related” by Scheindlin to an ongoing Federal Whistleblower case, the Christine Anderson case. ( Christine C. Anderson,Case No.: 07cv9599 Plaintiff Appellant, (SAS) (AJP), 2d Cir. No. 09-5059-cv v. The State of New York,Defendants-Appellee)
Steven Rodgers Vice President has allegedly conspired with WIPO, ( World Intellectual Property Organization) Director Francis Gurry, and also WIPO Legal Edward Kwakwa and also Eric Wilbers of WIPO, in order to wipe out blogs, online media that report on the iViewit Technology Story and cover up this massive liability by wiping out blogs, changing domain names servers of Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox.
I, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, have a web stat that shows WIPO looking at my Notice to WIPO of massive fraud, and then emailing Steven Rodgers of INTC, Intel Corporation.
Eric Wilbers of WIPO has spoke with Eliot Bernstein and Crystal Cox regarding this matter. WIPO has been notified of this massive fraud months ago, that will affect Intel, INTC Shareholders. WIPO has done nothing, that I am aware of, to correct this matter nor to notify executives, insurance providers, shareholders of this massive liability.
Steven Rodgers Intel Corporation knows of the iViewit Technology infringement by Intel, and has failed disclose this liability to Shareholders, Executives, Auditors..
Intel Corp. INTC Shareholders have a massive liability in this matter. This letter is a NOTICE to Intel Corp Executives, Shareholders, Auditors, Liability Carriers, Insurance Provides and more, to disclose this massive liability, that by LAW Intel Corporation, INTC, Must Disclose.
I, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, have attached the Federal RICO Complaint District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF to this eMail notice, as well as documents of Intel’s Connection to this liability.
Here is an Online Link to the RICO Complaint Filed February 26th, 2013 by Plaintiff, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/147018909/District-of-Nevada-213-cv-00297-JCM-NJK-Civil-RICO-Complaint-COX-vs-Randazza-RacketeerCorrupt-Organization-Jurisdiction-Diversity-Case
Also note that Portland Oregon Law Firm Tonkon Torp LLP and Mike Morgan of Tonkon Torp are also named in District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF.
Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Portland represented Intel and represented Enron in their bankruptcy, this is very much connected to the Iviewit Technology case and also brings massive financial liability to the shareholders of INTC, Intel Corp.
There is definite action that Steven Rodgers of INTC, Intel Corporation should have take to disclose this legal action. There is definite action that Bruce Sewell former General Counsel at Intel Corporation should have also taken to disclose this legal action. Bruce Sewell, now General Counsel of APPLE is also a named Defendant in District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF, as is APPLE Executive Steve Dowling.
This Notice of Claim and Liability serves as a warning to INTC, Intel Shareholders, Auditors, Insurance Providers, CEO’s, and all companies and people connected to INTC, Intel Financially for any reason of the massive, pending liability to Intel Corporation, INTC.
INTC, Intel has violated NDA’s with Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Technology. INTC, Intel is named in Federal RICO Complaints, SEC Complaints and more, in regard to massive liability over the infringement of the iViewit Video Technology, which is said to be worth 13 Trillion Dollars.
Knowing the liability that Intel, INTC has over the iViewit Video Technology, and violations of agreements with Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Technology, Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation recently conspired with WIPO and WIPO Panelist Peter L. Michaelson, to take Domain Names from Eliot Bernstein, Founder of iViewit and one of the iViewit Inventors, and Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, who had been reporting on the iViewit Technology theft for 3 years.
Peter L. Michaelson has conspired with the Plaintiff in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, Marc J. Randazza, who now is also a named Defendant in District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF, in order to launch a public defamation, disgrace, and discrediting campaign against Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, reporting on the iViewit Technology Theft for over 3 years.
Marc J. Randazza, Defendant in District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF, conspired by officially stating in WIPO Complaints, WIPO Publications, WIPO Decisions, and WIPO Legal Announcements to the World, that Eliot Bernstein, Founder of iViewit and one of the iViewit Inventors, and Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox are guilty of the crime of extortion, of which neither Eliot Bernstein, Founder of iViewit and one of the iViewit Inventors, nor Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox have been charged with, under investigation for, nor prosecuted of.
This action by Peter L. Michaelson and Marc J. Randazza in WIPO Decisions and in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, was intentional to discredit and silence the reporting of the world’s biggest technology crime. Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox has filed claims against all those conspiring with Plaintiff Marc J. Randazza in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, and the WIPO Decision.
I, Pro Se Plaintiff Crystal Cox, have attached correspondence between Intel, INTC and Eliot Bernstein to this notice. Here are links to further information regarding the massive liability to INTC, Intel Corp. Shareholders, Insurance Carriers and Intel Executives.
Links to Documents proving this massive Liability to INTC, Intel Shareholders, Auditors, Insurance Providers, CEO’s, and all companies and people connected to INTC, Intel Financially for any reason.
iViewit Technology SEC Complaint Naming INTC, Intel Corp.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
iViewit Technology NDA Agreements with INTC, Intel Corp.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/nda%20violators.pdf
iViewit Technology Demand Letter to INTC, Intel Corp.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/130695905/iviewittv_CompanyDocs_United-States-District-Court-Southern-District-NY_20090306-Intel-Demand-Letter-_-Liability-Exposure--Signed-3549l
More Regarding INTC, Intel Corp and iViewit Technology
.
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?tag=intc
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=498
http://www.rayfordwilkins.com/2012/10/intel-corp-intc-refuse-to-disclose.html
http://intelcorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/intel-general-counsel-bruce-sewell.html
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090306%20Intel%20Demand%20Letter%20&%20Liability%20Exposure%20%20Signed%203549l.pdf
http://federalricolawsuit.blogspot.com/2010/01/judiciary-committee-reviews-iviewit.html
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/RICO%20CRIME%20CHARTS.pdf
I, Pro Se Plaintiff Crystal Cox, am an Investigative Blogger, I have read thousands of pages of documents over 3 years, listened to Senate Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings, read depositions, read billing documents, listening to depositions, read court filings, read NDA agreements, and massive amounts of proof of the liability that Intel has. This is an Important issue and by LAW must be disclosed.
I, Pro Se Plaintiff Crystal Cox, intend to file this Notice with the SEC, 7 days after sending this official notice to INTC, Intel Corporation.
I have read SEC Complaints, RICO Complaints, USPTO Complaints, NDA Agreements, Contracts, and massive amounts of documented proof of the rightful Inventors and owner of the iViewit Technology that 99% of ALL video uses today, and I feel it is my duty to Warn INTC Investors, shareholders, auditors, insurance providers, ceos and more regarding this massive liability.
Upon my knowledge and belief, Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation has directly conspired to silence me, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, as I have been reporting on the iViewit Technology theft for over 3 years. Due to Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation conspiring to remove my online media regarding the iViewit Technology theft, I have filed legal action against Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation personally and professionally, and against the INTC Company for 10 Million Each.
This is a serious and valid Notice of Claim, Notice of Liability and is in response to Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation, Douglas Melamed, and Intel Corp. being named in a Federal RICO, Racketeering Lawsuit, FILED by Plaintiff Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF.
Defendant in District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF have directly attacked me, defaming me, suppressed my online news media blogs, endangered my life, threatened me, stolen my intellectual property, and ruined my reputation in order to SUPPRESS the flow of information regarding their involvement and liability in the iViewit Technology Theft.
Pro Se Plaintiff
District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF
Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox
Crystal Cox News
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
PDF of INTC, Intel Corp., Notice of Claim, Notice of Liability
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/148002688/INTC-Intel-Notice-of-Claim-Notice-of-Liablity
District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF RICO Filing
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/147018909/District-of-Nevada-213-cv-00297-JCM-NJK-Civil-RICO-Complaint-COX-vs-Randazza-RacketeerCorrupt-Organization-Jurisdiction-Diversity-Case
District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF Docket
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/147851256/213-cv-00297-JCM-VCF---Nevada-RICO
If you are concerned about this serious liability to INTC, Intel Corp. Stocks, Shares, Assets or have questions regarding this legal action, here are Intel Corp., INTC Key Executive, and Contact Information.
Originally Posted At
http://deniedpatent.blogspot.com/2013/03/plaintiff-investigative-blogger-crystal.html
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Pro Se Plaintiff
District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
March 6th, 2013
Steven R. Rodgers
Vice President of Legal, Corporate Affairs and
Deputy General Counsel of Litigation, Licensing & Patents, Intel Corporation
Douglas Melamed
Intel Corp. General Counsel
Intel, INTC Shareholders, Auditors, Insurance Providers
Regarding: NOTICE of Liability;
Notice of Claim Regarding Intel Corporation and Possible Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel, INTC Shareholders and Others. Notice to all Intel Executives, Shareholders, Board Members, Insurance Providers, Auditors, and all financially connected to Intel Corp., INTC in any way.
Notice Regarding RICO / Racketeering Complaint Filed in District Of Nevada, Liability to INTC, Intel Shareholders and Intel Executives.
District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF names Douglas Melamed, Steven R. Rodgers and Intel Corp. in conspiracy to STOP the flow of information in online media regarding INTC, Intel’s Involvement in the iViewit Technology Theft.
Douglas Melamed, Steven R. Rodgers and Whom It May Concern:
This notice is written upon the Knowledge and Belief of Investigative Blogger Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox. I, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, write this letter to notify you of legal action pending against Intel, INTC in the District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF Lawsuit, whereby Intel Corp., Douglas Melamed, and Steven R. Rodgers are named Defendants.
Notice was sent to Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation, who is named Personally and Professionally, On December 27th 2012 and again in On January 27th 2013. As well as updated court documents. Notices have also been sent to INTC, Intel Corp. General Counsel Douglas Melamed
Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation have, thus far, ignored this serious legal matter, and it is assumed have failed to notify auditors, shareholders, Intel Ceo’s, and all who should be notified of this massive liability to Intel Corp. and INTC Shareholders.
Upon information and belief, the frauds included but are not limited to the failure of Intel Corp., INTC, to disclose both this lawsuit and the Intellectual Property infringement of the iViewit Technology, which is a Trillion dollar liability to Intel, INTC Shareholders and the Intel Corporation.
Intel Corp., INTC executives have known of this massive liability over violations of NDA’s and infringement of the iViewit Video Technology for over a Decade.
Ex-Senior Vice President, General Counsel of Intel Corp., INTC, Bruce Sewell, now General Counsel of APPLE, who is also named in this Federal RICO Lawsuit. Corresponded with Eliot Bernstein regarding this massive undisclosed liability. I, Crystal Cox have attached those correspondences to this Notice of Liability, as well as added links at the bottom of this letter.
APPLE Executive Steven Dowling has also communicated with Eliot Bernstein of iViewit Technology regarding this massive undisclosed liability.
Eliot Bernstein, founder of iViewit Technology Company, and one of the inventors of the iViewit Video Technology, is named as a Defendant in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, which was filed in alleged conspiracy to suppress Internet Blogs, Domain Names and Online Media reporting on the iViewit Technology theft, which involves Intel Corp., INTC, as noted in the iViewit Technology SEC Complaint, RICO Complaint, FBI Complaints, USPTO Complaint and other Federal Investigations into this matter.
In regard to Eliot Bernstein and the iViewit Technology Company, Intel Corp., INTC has massive, undisclosed liabilities and this notice is to warn all those financially tied to INTC, Intel Corporation of this massive liability. Failing to disclose this liability is in direct violation of various SEC laws and rules including but not limited to FASB No. 5 requirements for disclosing liabilities and more.
The Eliot Bernstein and the iViewit Technology Company, also involves an attempted murder of his family and a car bombing that blew up three vehicles in addition to Bernstein Vehicle.
The iViewit Technology theft is a very serious matter, and a massive, undisclosed liability to Intel, INTC shareholders, auditors, and executives. The iViewit Technology theft involves high stakes corporate theft and fraud of a 13 Trillion Dollar Intellectual Property.
Notably, federal Judge Shira Scheindlin referred to the iViewit Case as a case involving Murder that has also been marked as legally “related” by Scheindlin to an ongoing Federal Whistleblower case, the Christine Anderson case. ( Christine C. Anderson,Case No.: 07cv9599 Plaintiff Appellant, (SAS) (AJP), 2d Cir. No. 09-5059-cv v. The State of New York,Defendants-Appellee)
Steven Rodgers Vice President has allegedly conspired with WIPO, ( World Intellectual Property Organization) Director Francis Gurry, and also WIPO Legal Edward Kwakwa and also Eric Wilbers of WIPO, in order to wipe out blogs, online media that report on the iViewit Technology Story and cover up this massive liability by wiping out blogs, changing domain names servers of Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox.
I, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, have a web stat that shows WIPO looking at my Notice to WIPO of massive fraud, and then emailing Steven Rodgers of INTC, Intel Corporation.
Eric Wilbers of WIPO has spoke with Eliot Bernstein and Crystal Cox regarding this matter. WIPO has been notified of this massive fraud months ago, that will affect Intel, INTC Shareholders. WIPO has done nothing, that I am aware of, to correct this matter nor to notify executives, insurance providers, shareholders of this massive liability.
Steven Rodgers Intel Corporation knows of the iViewit Technology infringement by Intel, and has failed disclose this liability to Shareholders, Executives, Auditors..
Intel Corp. INTC Shareholders have a massive liability in this matter. This letter is a NOTICE to Intel Corp Executives, Shareholders, Auditors, Liability Carriers, Insurance Provides and more, to disclose this massive liability, that by LAW Intel Corporation, INTC, Must Disclose.
I, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, have attached the Federal RICO Complaint District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF to this eMail notice, as well as documents of Intel’s Connection to this liability.
Here is an Online Link to the RICO Complaint Filed February 26th, 2013 by Plaintiff, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/147018909/District-of-Nevada-213-cv-00297-JCM-NJK-Civil-RICO-Complaint-COX-vs-Randazza-RacketeerCorrupt-Organization-Jurisdiction-Diversity-Case
Also note that Portland Oregon Law Firm Tonkon Torp LLP and Mike Morgan of Tonkon Torp are also named in District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF.
Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Portland represented Intel and represented Enron in their bankruptcy, this is very much connected to the Iviewit Technology case and also brings massive financial liability to the shareholders of INTC, Intel Corp.
There is definite action that Steven Rodgers of INTC, Intel Corporation should have take to disclose this legal action. There is definite action that Bruce Sewell former General Counsel at Intel Corporation should have also taken to disclose this legal action. Bruce Sewell, now General Counsel of APPLE is also a named Defendant in District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF, as is APPLE Executive Steve Dowling.
This Notice of Claim and Liability serves as a warning to INTC, Intel Shareholders, Auditors, Insurance Providers, CEO’s, and all companies and people connected to INTC, Intel Financially for any reason of the massive, pending liability to Intel Corporation, INTC.
INTC, Intel has violated NDA’s with Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Technology. INTC, Intel is named in Federal RICO Complaints, SEC Complaints and more, in regard to massive liability over the infringement of the iViewit Video Technology, which is said to be worth 13 Trillion Dollars.
Knowing the liability that Intel, INTC has over the iViewit Video Technology, and violations of agreements with Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Technology, Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation recently conspired with WIPO and WIPO Panelist Peter L. Michaelson, to take Domain Names from Eliot Bernstein, Founder of iViewit and one of the iViewit Inventors, and Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, who had been reporting on the iViewit Technology theft for 3 years.
Peter L. Michaelson has conspired with the Plaintiff in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, Marc J. Randazza, who now is also a named Defendant in District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF, in order to launch a public defamation, disgrace, and discrediting campaign against Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, reporting on the iViewit Technology Theft for over 3 years.
Marc J. Randazza, Defendant in District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF, conspired by officially stating in WIPO Complaints, WIPO Publications, WIPO Decisions, and WIPO Legal Announcements to the World, that Eliot Bernstein, Founder of iViewit and one of the iViewit Inventors, and Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox are guilty of the crime of extortion, of which neither Eliot Bernstein, Founder of iViewit and one of the iViewit Inventors, nor Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox have been charged with, under investigation for, nor prosecuted of.
This action by Peter L. Michaelson and Marc J. Randazza in WIPO Decisions and in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, was intentional to discredit and silence the reporting of the world’s biggest technology crime. Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox has filed claims against all those conspiring with Plaintiff Marc J. Randazza in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, and the WIPO Decision.
I, Pro Se Plaintiff Crystal Cox, have attached correspondence between Intel, INTC and Eliot Bernstein to this notice. Here are links to further information regarding the massive liability to INTC, Intel Corp. Shareholders, Insurance Carriers and Intel Executives.
Links to Documents proving this massive Liability to INTC, Intel Shareholders, Auditors, Insurance Providers, CEO’s, and all companies and people connected to INTC, Intel Financially for any reason.
iViewit Technology SEC Complaint Naming INTC, Intel Corp.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
iViewit Technology NDA Agreements with INTC, Intel Corp.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/nda%20violators.pdf
iViewit Technology Demand Letter to INTC, Intel Corp.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/130695905/iviewittv_CompanyDocs_United-States-District-Court-Southern-District-NY_20090306-Intel-Demand-Letter-_-Liability-Exposure--Signed-3549l
More Regarding INTC, Intel Corp and iViewit Technology
.
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?tag=intc
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=498
http://www.rayfordwilkins.com/2012/10/intel-corp-intc-refuse-to-disclose.html
http://intelcorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/intel-general-counsel-bruce-sewell.html
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090306%20Intel%20Demand%20Letter%20&%20Liability%20Exposure%20%20Signed%203549l.pdf
http://federalricolawsuit.blogspot.com/2010/01/judiciary-committee-reviews-iviewit.html
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/RICO%20CRIME%20CHARTS.pdf
I, Pro Se Plaintiff Crystal Cox, am an Investigative Blogger, I have read thousands of pages of documents over 3 years, listened to Senate Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings, read depositions, read billing documents, listening to depositions, read court filings, read NDA agreements, and massive amounts of proof of the liability that Intel has. This is an Important issue and by LAW must be disclosed.
I, Pro Se Plaintiff Crystal Cox, intend to file this Notice with the SEC, 7 days after sending this official notice to INTC, Intel Corporation.
I have read SEC Complaints, RICO Complaints, USPTO Complaints, NDA Agreements, Contracts, and massive amounts of documented proof of the rightful Inventors and owner of the iViewit Technology that 99% of ALL video uses today, and I feel it is my duty to Warn INTC Investors, shareholders, auditors, insurance providers, ceos and more regarding this massive liability.
Upon my knowledge and belief, Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation has directly conspired to silence me, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, as I have been reporting on the iViewit Technology theft for over 3 years. Due to Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation conspiring to remove my online media regarding the iViewit Technology theft, I have filed legal action against Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation personally and professionally, and against the INTC Company for 10 Million Each.
This is a serious and valid Notice of Claim, Notice of Liability and is in response to Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation, Douglas Melamed, and Intel Corp. being named in a Federal RICO, Racketeering Lawsuit, FILED by Plaintiff Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF.
Defendant in District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF have directly attacked me, defaming me, suppressed my online news media blogs, endangered my life, threatened me, stolen my intellectual property, and ruined my reputation in order to SUPPRESS the flow of information regarding their involvement and liability in the iViewit Technology Theft.
Pro Se Plaintiff
District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF
Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox
Crystal Cox News
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
PDF of INTC, Intel Corp., Notice of Claim, Notice of Liability
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/148002688/INTC-Intel-Notice-of-Claim-Notice-of-Liablity
District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF RICO Filing
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/147018909/District-of-Nevada-213-cv-00297-JCM-NJK-Civil-RICO-Complaint-COX-vs-Randazza-RacketeerCorrupt-Organization-Jurisdiction-Diversity-Case
District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF Docket
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/147851256/213-cv-00297-JCM-VCF---Nevada-RICO
If you are concerned about this serious liability to INTC, Intel Corp. Stocks, Shares, Assets or have questions regarding this legal action, here are Intel Corp., INTC Key Executive, and Contact Information.
Originally Posted At
http://deniedpatent.blogspot.com/2013/03/plaintiff-investigative-blogger-crystal.html
INTENT TO DECEIVE AND COMITT FRAUD UPON THE USPTO ~ iViewit Technology Theft Story, Eliot Bernstein
"CHANGE OF INVENTOR REQUEST
US SERIAL NO. 09 522 721
PURSUANT TO 37CFR 1.48
I, Eliot I. Bernstein, as acting President of Iviewit and its affiliates, and as a named
inventor on this application, hereby request that the true and correct inventors be added
and the wrong inventors removed from this Non Provisional application 09 522 721 to
properly name the inventors of this invention.
The listed and incorrect inventors for this application are:
Eliot I. Bernstein
The true and correct inventors for this application are:
Eliot I. Bernstein
Zakirul Shirajee
Jude Rosario
The reason for this correction:
The true and correct inventors have been purposefully been left off this patent application
by three different counsels all failing to correctly fix the inventor issues and wrong
disclosures. Since the creation of the invention, our initial counsel in the Provisional
filing 60 125 824 attorneys Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose LLP (“PR”) and
Raymond Joao of Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf & Schlissel, P.C., (“MLGS”) failed
after repeated requests to make the inventor and content changes, although they had full
knowledge of the correct inventors and the correct invention. In addition, the content of
the Provisional application had changed from what the inventors disclosed initially and
pertinent disclosures were left out with malice and intent to deceive the USPTO and
further deprive the inventors of their inventions. Subsequent counsel to “PR” attorneys
William Dick, Douglas Boehm and Steven Becker of Foley & Lardner (“FL”) on this
Non Provisional filing, failed to correct either the inventors or the content of the
Provisional or Non-Provisional. This may now leave the pertinent disclosures left off and
incorrect inventors, to serve as new matter in the in subsequent Non Provisional filings
that claim priority to the Provisional application. "
Source and Full Document
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/EXHIBITS/09%20522%20721%20Change%20of%20Inventorship%20Form%20ALL%20PATENTS%20CROSSBOW%20S.pdf
http://federalricolawsuit.blogspot.com/2010/01/judiciary-committee-reviews-iviewit.html
iViewit RICO Crime Chart
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/RICO%20CRIME%20CHARTS.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/
US SERIAL NO. 09 522 721
PURSUANT TO 37CFR 1.48
INTENT TO DECIEVE AND COMMITT FRAUD UPON THE USPTO
I, Eliot I. Bernstein, as acting President of Iviewit and its affiliates, and as a named
inventor on this application, hereby request that the true and correct inventors be added
and the wrong inventors removed from this Non Provisional application 09 522 721 to
properly name the inventors of this invention.
The listed and incorrect inventors for this application are:
Eliot I. Bernstein
The true and correct inventors for this application are:
Eliot I. Bernstein
Zakirul Shirajee
Jude Rosario
The reason for this correction:
The true and correct inventors have been purposefully been left off this patent application
by three different counsels all failing to correctly fix the inventor issues and wrong
disclosures. Since the creation of the invention, our initial counsel in the Provisional
filing 60 125 824 attorneys Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose LLP (“PR”) and
Raymond Joao of Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf & Schlissel, P.C., (“MLGS”) failed
after repeated requests to make the inventor and content changes, although they had full
knowledge of the correct inventors and the correct invention. In addition, the content of
the Provisional application had changed from what the inventors disclosed initially and
pertinent disclosures were left out with malice and intent to deceive the USPTO and
further deprive the inventors of their inventions. Subsequent counsel to “PR” attorneys
William Dick, Douglas Boehm and Steven Becker of Foley & Lardner (“FL”) on this
Non Provisional filing, failed to correct either the inventors or the content of the
Provisional or Non-Provisional. This may now leave the pertinent disclosures left off and
incorrect inventors, to serve as new matter in the in subsequent Non Provisional filings
that claim priority to the Provisional application. "
Source and Full Document
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/EXHIBITS/09%20522%20721%20Change%20of%20Inventorship%20Form%20ALL%20PATENTS%20CROSSBOW%20S.pdf
More on the iViewit Technology Theft
iViewit RICO Crime Chart
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/RICO%20CRIME%20CHARTS.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/
Full RICO Filing
iViewit Supreme Court Case
iViewit SEC Complaint
iViewit Motion to ReHear
My Blog on the iViewit Story
Friday, January 16, 2015
Open Letter to Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, Liberty Media Holdings Regarding Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, Liberty Media Holdings Profiting from PORN? If not then they are allowing "trusted" children's Brands to be Tarnished. Either they Profit, BIGTIME, From Porn or they Look the Other Way While Superhero and Action Figure Porn Corrupts YOUR Children.
Attention Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, Liberty Media Holdings:
Regarding: Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics Trademarks Targeted at Children to lure them into watching and becoming "entertained" by Porn.
I am Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, I have reported extensively for over 3 years regarding the iViewit Technology and the infringement of the iViewit technology by those who signed NDA Agreements such as Warner Bros., as you know from previous disclosure letters send to you, asking that you notify auditors and shareholders.
http://crystalcox.blogspot.com/2013/03/twx-open-letter-to-time-warner-warner.html
I Pro Se Plaintiff Crystal L. Cox have recently named you in a RICO / Racketeering Complaint as you know, and surely have disclosed to your shareholders.
In being sued by Porn Attorney Marc Randazza over an alleged Trademark, and to shut down my blogs reporting on the iViewit Technology infringement, I have discovered that Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics Trademarks are being Targeted at Children to lure them into watching and becoming addicted to Porn at an early age. I assume that Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, and Liberty Media Holdings know Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch is profiting from the use of Superman and other action figures, superheros in their Porn Movies. These are movies containing the "brands", "trademarks" of Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics. And they are PORN directed toward children in the search engines and video search sites.
It is the responsibility of Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics to protect their brands, and their shareholders, so it seems safe to assume that either Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics is suing Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch regarding Superman Porn and other Action Figure, Comic Porn, Superhero Porn and the use of their Copyright, their Trademark. OR Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics has licensed Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch to market porn directly to Children with the Trademark of Superheros, Action Heros, Comic.
Do the shareholders of Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics know about this licensing? Do the shareholders of Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics also profit from the use of "company" trademarks in Porn Parodies, Superman Movies?
"Warner Bros. Wins ‘Superman’ Copyright Case Against Joe Shuster’s Heirs"
http://screenrant.com/superman-copyright-lawsuit-shuster-warner-bros-wins/
DC Comics, Inc. DC Entertainment is a company of Warner Bros. Entertainment, which itself is owned by Time Warner. DC Comics produces material featuring a large number of well-known characters, including Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, the Flash, Aquaman, Hawkman, Hawkgirl, Green Arrow, Black Canary and the Martian Manhunter, along with such superhero teams as the Justice League and the Teen Titans, as well as antagonists such as Lex Luthor, the Joker, Darkseid, the Riddler, Catwoman, Brainiac and the Penguin. Many of these are used in Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch and Axel Braun's Porn Parody which is superheros, action figures, engaging in Porn.
Vivid Entertainment is in the search for Comic Book Movie, Fan Sites, Action Figure News, and this is PORN, this is not to lure in adults. It is targeted at getting children interested in and addicted to porn, through their favorite action figures, Superheros, and these Superheros are Copyrighted by Disney and Warner Bros.
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/ActionFigureNews/news/?a=25748
This site also sells Superman, Comic Book merchandise.
Comics and Porn, is this an image that Warner Bros. wants? Do Warner Bros., Time Warner, DC Comics shareholders Support this?
The Search Term DC Comics should by copyrighted by Time Warner, Warner Bros., yet nothing is done to protect the DC Comics Brand from being used in Porn that is directed at Children. Liberty Media Holdings attorney sues people often for the smallest possibly infringement, so surely this HUGE use of a Time Warner Inc. Brand, is licensed and profited from by Liberty Media Holdings, TWX, Warner Bros. and Time Warner or Liberty Media Holdings attorneys Jordan Rushie and Mark Randazza would be suing them right?
Instead Liberty Media Holdings attorney Jordan Rushie is attacking a blogger who is exposing the porn industry, and speaking out about the iViewit Technology and Liberty Media Holdings attorney Marc Randazza is suing that same blogger, me, and alleging a Trademark infringement and he wants 100,000 for each alleged infringement and massive attorney fees.
Below is a Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch Superman Porn Movie Trailer in YouTube and easily found in the search engines by your children.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usDo5H7mGp0
This Superman Porn "official teaser" comes up in the YouTube search right along side your other Superman, Superhero and Action Figure Videos.
A the end of this Superman Video is a *Disclaimer* "This is a parody movie. Superman is a registered trademark of DC Comics, a general partnership, composed of Warner Communication Inc. and E.C. Publications, Inc. This video is not sponsored, endorsed, by or affiliated with DC Comics, Warner Communications Inc. or E.C. Publications, Inc. or any other person or entity affiliated with any of them."
Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. is the owner of the Superman trademark, so this seems to be saying that Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. does not endorse the movie, however, that certainly does not mean that Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. and Liberty Media Holdings is not profiting from the movie. How can they not be, with the massive aggression that these Porn Industry, Copyright Troll Attorneys such as Jordan Rush Marc Randazza use against the tiniest of infringement on imaginary trademarks. Surely if there was a trademark issue with Superman, then Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. part owner Liberty Media Holdings would have their thug attorneys sue Vivid Entertainment.
If Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. Disgraces the Brand, Misuse the Copyright, Tarnish the Trademark, does the rights revert back to the Siegel Family, the Heirs, Laura Siegel Larson
Another Superman Porn Movie Trailer in YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gMnC15g0qQ
Liberty Media Holdings and Porn Companies, Porn Attorneys, Some Legal Cases. There are many cases where Jordan Rushie, Marc Randazza, J. Malcom DeVoy and Ronald Green sue people for allegedly infringing on Liberty Media Holdings copyrighted material.
http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/02/copyright-lawsuit-is-alleged-to-be.html
http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/tag/liberty-media-holdings/
http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/copyright-lawsuits/pennsylvania-eastern-district-court/102558/liberty-media-holdings-llc-v-john-does-1-265/summary/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/101705882/4-17-2012-Motion-to-Take-Pre-Complaint-Discovery
More about the Massive Shareholder Liability over the iViewit Technology Infringment by Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc.
http://www.crystalcox.com/2011/07/warner-bros-signed-non-disclosure.html
Liberty Media Holdings Attorney, also Corbin Fisher and other Porn Companies, Marc J. Randazza SUED me, blogger Crystal Cox, and iViewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein claiming that he had a Trademark on the name Marc Randazza. Manwin sued Nicholas Bulgin regarding ManwinSucks.com, yet these these Porn Companies profiting massively from a real Trademark is somehow overlooked. So I assume that the Trademark owner is profiting or they would sue.
Porn Attorney Marc Randazza also claimed in Randazza V. Cox, Bernstein that he wanted the Courts to STOP me, Blogger Crystal Cox from titling blogs and YouTube Videos with the name Marc Randazza, so I would not come up in the search for his name when talking about him. Yet SUPERMAN, Porn, Comics, DC Comics all come up in Porn Searches and are definitely a well known, household name Trademark.
Liberty Media Holdings owns part of Time Warner Inc., therefore owns part of the Superman Trademark Profit, and DC Comics yet Liberty Media Holdings sues people who download porn from their sites, who allegedly infringe on their copyright? Liberty Media Holdings would SUE Vivid Entertainment Steven Hirsch and Axel Braun if they were not getting ROYALTIES.
So the question then becomes do the shareholders of Time Warner Inc., Warner Bros., Liberty Media Holdings know what they are profiting from Porn directed at children through their favorite super hero or action figure?
Do Liberty Media Holdings Shareholders, Time Warner Inc. Shareholders, Warner Bros. shareholders know about the iViewit Technology Infringement and the massive liability to them?
Do Liberty Media Holdings Shareholders, Time Warner Inc. Shareholders, Warner Bros. shareholders know about being named in a 100 Billion Dollar Racketeering Lawsuit filed in February of 2013?
https://www.facebook.com/iviewit/posts/133089426862083
http://federalricolawsuit.blogspot.com/2010/01/judiciary-committee-reviews-iviewit.html
iViewit RICO Crime Chart
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/RICO%20CRIME%20CHARTS.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/
http://www.iviewit.tv/
Regarding: Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics Trademarks Targeted at Children to lure them into watching and becoming "entertained" by Porn.
I am Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, I have reported extensively for over 3 years regarding the iViewit Technology and the infringement of the iViewit technology by those who signed NDA Agreements such as Warner Bros., as you know from previous disclosure letters send to you, asking that you notify auditors and shareholders.
http://crystalcox.blogspot.com/2013/03/twx-open-letter-to-time-warner-warner.html
I Pro Se Plaintiff Crystal L. Cox have recently named you in a RICO / Racketeering Complaint as you know, and surely have disclosed to your shareholders.
In being sued by Porn Attorney Marc Randazza over an alleged Trademark, and to shut down my blogs reporting on the iViewit Technology infringement, I have discovered that Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics Trademarks are being Targeted at Children to lure them into watching and becoming addicted to Porn at an early age. I assume that Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, and Liberty Media Holdings know Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch is profiting from the use of Superman and other action figures, superheros in their Porn Movies. These are movies containing the "brands", "trademarks" of Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics. And they are PORN directed toward children in the search engines and video search sites.
It is the responsibility of Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics to protect their brands, and their shareholders, so it seems safe to assume that either Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics is suing Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch regarding Superman Porn and other Action Figure, Comic Porn, Superhero Porn and the use of their Copyright, their Trademark. OR Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics has licensed Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch to market porn directly to Children with the Trademark of Superheros, Action Heros, Comic.
Do the shareholders of Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics know about this licensing? Do the shareholders of Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics also profit from the use of "company" trademarks in Porn Parodies, Superman Movies?
"Warner Bros. Wins ‘Superman’ Copyright Case Against Joe Shuster’s Heirs"
http://screenrant.com/superman-copyright-lawsuit-shuster-warner-bros-wins/
DC Comics, Inc. DC Entertainment is a company of Warner Bros. Entertainment, which itself is owned by Time Warner. DC Comics produces material featuring a large number of well-known characters, including Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, the Flash, Aquaman, Hawkman, Hawkgirl, Green Arrow, Black Canary and the Martian Manhunter, along with such superhero teams as the Justice League and the Teen Titans, as well as antagonists such as Lex Luthor, the Joker, Darkseid, the Riddler, Catwoman, Brainiac and the Penguin. Many of these are used in Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch and Axel Braun's Porn Parody which is superheros, action figures, engaging in Porn.
Vivid Entertainment is in the search for Comic Book Movie, Fan Sites, Action Figure News, and this is PORN, this is not to lure in adults. It is targeted at getting children interested in and addicted to porn, through their favorite action figures, Superheros, and these Superheros are Copyrighted by Disney and Warner Bros.
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/ActionFigureNews/news/?a=25748
This site also sells Superman, Comic Book merchandise.
Comics and Porn, is this an image that Warner Bros. wants? Do Warner Bros., Time Warner, DC Comics shareholders Support this?
The Search Term DC Comics should by copyrighted by Time Warner, Warner Bros., yet nothing is done to protect the DC Comics Brand from being used in Porn that is directed at Children. Liberty Media Holdings attorney sues people often for the smallest possibly infringement, so surely this HUGE use of a Time Warner Inc. Brand, is licensed and profited from by Liberty Media Holdings, TWX, Warner Bros. and Time Warner or Liberty Media Holdings attorneys Jordan Rushie and Mark Randazza would be suing them right?
Instead Liberty Media Holdings attorney Jordan Rushie is attacking a blogger who is exposing the porn industry, and speaking out about the iViewit Technology and Liberty Media Holdings attorney Marc Randazza is suing that same blogger, me, and alleging a Trademark infringement and he wants 100,000 for each alleged infringement and massive attorney fees.
Below is a Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch Superman Porn Movie Trailer in YouTube and easily found in the search engines by your children.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usDo5H7mGp0
This Superman Porn "official teaser" comes up in the YouTube search right along side your other Superman, Superhero and Action Figure Videos.
A the end of this Superman Video is a *Disclaimer* "This is a parody movie. Superman is a registered trademark of DC Comics, a general partnership, composed of Warner Communication Inc. and E.C. Publications, Inc. This video is not sponsored, endorsed, by or affiliated with DC Comics, Warner Communications Inc. or E.C. Publications, Inc. or any other person or entity affiliated with any of them."
Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. is the owner of the Superman trademark, so this seems to be saying that Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. does not endorse the movie, however, that certainly does not mean that Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. and Liberty Media Holdings is not profiting from the movie. How can they not be, with the massive aggression that these Porn Industry, Copyright Troll Attorneys such as Jordan Rush Marc Randazza use against the tiniest of infringement on imaginary trademarks. Surely if there was a trademark issue with Superman, then Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. part owner Liberty Media Holdings would have their thug attorneys sue Vivid Entertainment.
If Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. Disgraces the Brand, Misuse the Copyright, Tarnish the Trademark, does the rights revert back to the Siegel Family, the Heirs, Laura Siegel Larson
Another Superman Porn Movie Trailer in YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gMnC15g0qQ
Liberty Media Holdings and Porn Companies, Porn Attorneys, Some Legal Cases. There are many cases where Jordan Rushie, Marc Randazza, J. Malcom DeVoy and Ronald Green sue people for allegedly infringing on Liberty Media Holdings copyrighted material.
http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/02/copyright-lawsuit-is-alleged-to-be.html
http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/tag/liberty-media-holdings/
http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/copyright-lawsuits/pennsylvania-eastern-district-court/102558/liberty-media-holdings-llc-v-john-does-1-265/summary/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/101705882/4-17-2012-Motion-to-Take-Pre-Complaint-Discovery
More about the Massive Shareholder Liability over the iViewit Technology Infringment by Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc.
http://www.crystalcox.com/2011/07/warner-bros-signed-non-disclosure.html
Liberty Media Holdings Attorney, also Corbin Fisher and other Porn Companies, Marc J. Randazza SUED me, blogger Crystal Cox, and iViewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein claiming that he had a Trademark on the name Marc Randazza. Manwin sued Nicholas Bulgin regarding ManwinSucks.com, yet these these Porn Companies profiting massively from a real Trademark is somehow overlooked. So I assume that the Trademark owner is profiting or they would sue.
Porn Attorney Marc Randazza also claimed in Randazza V. Cox, Bernstein that he wanted the Courts to STOP me, Blogger Crystal Cox from titling blogs and YouTube Videos with the name Marc Randazza, so I would not come up in the search for his name when talking about him. Yet SUPERMAN, Porn, Comics, DC Comics all come up in Porn Searches and are definitely a well known, household name Trademark.
Liberty Media Holdings owns part of Time Warner Inc., therefore owns part of the Superman Trademark Profit, and DC Comics yet Liberty Media Holdings sues people who download porn from their sites, who allegedly infringe on their copyright? Liberty Media Holdings would SUE Vivid Entertainment Steven Hirsch and Axel Braun if they were not getting ROYALTIES.
So the question then becomes do the shareholders of Time Warner Inc., Warner Bros., Liberty Media Holdings know what they are profiting from Porn directed at children through their favorite super hero or action figure?
Do Liberty Media Holdings Shareholders, Time Warner Inc. Shareholders, Warner Bros. shareholders know about the iViewit Technology Infringement and the massive liability to them?
Do Liberty Media Holdings Shareholders, Time Warner Inc. Shareholders, Warner Bros. shareholders know about being named in a 100 Billion Dollar Racketeering Lawsuit filed in February of 2013?
Also Check Out
https://www.facebook.com/iviewit/posts/133089426862083
http://federalricolawsuit.blogspot.com/2010/01/judiciary-committee-reviews-iviewit.html
iViewit RICO Crime Chart
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/RICO%20CRIME%20CHARTS.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/
http://www.iviewit.tv/
Full RICO Filing
iViewit Supreme Court Case
iViewit SEC Complaint
iViewit Motion to ReHear
Monday, January 5, 2015
Randazza Legal Group and Marc Randazza abuse the Power of the Courts for their own intellectual property thieving and First Amendment Rights Violating Motives.
Attorney Marc Randazza uses Protective Orders, Civil Lawsuits and TRO's to Chill Speech, Suppress Speech, Violate First Amendment Rights and all at the same time as falsely advertising to be a Free Speech Advocate and First Amendment Rights, FOR ALL, attorney.
Las Vegas based Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group uses the courts as his private play ground to bully those who dare to exercise their Free Speech rights and speak out about him, his "friends" and "associates", his law firm or his wife.
Marc Randazza does this while at the same time, PRETENDING, to advocate Free Speech for ALL.
Marc Randazza uses Protective Orders to get GAG ORDERS on those who exercise their First Amendment rights talking about him, or those who create a PARODY making fun of him. He does this while at the same time flat out lying that he is an advocate for the Free Speech rights of ALL.
Marc Randazza is certainly NOT for the First Amendment rights of Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers NOR of me, Crystal Cox.
Marc Randazza used an unconstitutional preliminary TRO's (alleged "Temporary" Restraining Orders"" to simply shut down massive blogs (speech) of mine and that "TEMPORARY" was well over 2 years now. He flat out misused the courts to STEAL intellectual property, STEAL search engine ranking, and suppress speech. He did this claiming Trademark rights. Yet they were clearly blogs that were "Gripe Site" and "Sucks Sites" of which he has previously defended.
Marc Randazza not only STOLE my intellectual property, my search engine ranking, and violated my First Amendment rights but he used all my decades of work and proprietary knowledge against me pointing the servers illegally to a blog post on his blog and his buddies blogs lying about me, defaming me, falsely accusing me of criminal activity and ruining my real estate career, my quality of life, my online business and ALL because he did not APPROVE of the online "SPEECH" I was using in griping about him and his wife.
Marc Randazza files a protective order with the courts, files a civil suit then uses that to ATTACK his target. He is then an officer of the court and can pry into your private life as deep as he wants. He uses this power to harass your church, publicize your home address, get your bank and wire records, get your phone records, harass clients and customers, harass and bully ex's, constantly question you, have you followed and abuse the power of the courts to ruin your life, business and relationships.
Attorney Marc Randazza, who is allegedly connected to the mafia. Marc Randazza DOES protect the rights of pedophiles to write guides on pedophiles, does associate with and said to employ Sean Tompkins and Ari Bass (Michael Whiteacre) to bully, threaten, stalk, harass and put "real fear" into those who Marc Randazza does not like, Marc Randazza does talk about the death of his targets and he bullies, threatens, lies about, criminal defames his targets such as me and Alexandra Mayers. He does REAL STUFF to ruin lives, and yet he pretends he is the victim, scared of us and the courts, judges give him his way, give him an illegal and unethical protective order which he uses as a GAG ORDER and a way to suppress SPEECH and steal intellectual property.
Yet Attorney Marc Randazza claims to be afraid of a woman me, and another woman in a separate protective order, Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers and this fear is so bad he gets a protective order against us when he is the one that is breaking the law, bullying us, intimidating us, violating our rights and abusing the courts to do it.
Attorney Marc Randazza abuses the power of the courts, is above the law and the question becomes why? Why do Las Vegas judges give Marc Randazza super powers in the courts to abuse, stalk, bully, steal intellectual property, intimidate, threaten and all with the power of a TRO / a Protective Order that he gets the minute he asks based on his "STATED" fear or his STATED Trademark Violation. This is CLEARLY against the law but Attorney Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group's victims have NO RIGHTS in a COURT OF LAW. Only Mr. Randazza has rights and these rights violate the constitution of the United States and violate the LAW. Oh well Attorney Marc Randazza controls your courts and DOES NOT ABIDE BY THE LAW. That Fact sure seems to be clear to me.
Las Vegas based Lawyer Marc Randazza falsely claims to be an advocate for Free Speech Rights for ALL and for the First Amendment Rights of ALL even pedophiles and even in the domain name GlenBeckRapedANDmurderedayounggirlin1990.com YET he suppresses the speech of those he does not like or approve of and he uses the power of the courts to do it.
Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claims to be a Trademark expert, he falsely advertises his expertise in this field, yet he FALSELY sued me, Crystal Cox, his former client claiming a Trademark violation against him, his wife, and his toddler. Randazza did this with willful and wanton intend to harass, bully, intimidate, cause harm and ruin the life of his target, in this case me, his former client Blogger Crystal Cox. Randazza either is NOT a Trademark Law expert or he is and he used that expertise to commit fraud on the court and sue a former client claiming a cause of action of Trademark Law of which he clearly had no legal rights.
Why? He did this in order to try and shut me up because I was exercising my free speech rights and First Amendment rights to have gripe sites against him, call his wife a slut and review his legal practice and law firm with sucks sites. Randazza STOLE those sites and blogs that were in the top 10 search for Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group and he used a protective order, a TRO to do it. No muss, No fuss; he says he is in fear and the courts simply give him his wish, it's MAGIC.
Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claims to be an expert in intellectual property law yet he did not own his Trademark nor his wife, nor child and sued me claiming he had a Trademark. Marc Randazza did not even own his name as a dotcom yet FALSELY advertised that he is a Domain Name expert.
Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group make False claims daily, yet for some reason they get away with it. Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group are not ethical, do not operate under the color of law as far as I see it and are unconstitutional. Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group have super powers in the courts, it seems, and are oddly protected by Judges across the United States and probably in other countries. And for some reason they still get away with their INJUSTICE.
I will soon be filing a DOJ and FBI complaint regarding all of these issues. As Soon as I can.
I BELIEVE it is against the law to make False Claims in Advertising.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/3729
Randazza makes fraudulent claim of being an advocate for ALL speech, False Claims of being a Trademark Expert and Intellectual Property Expert. In my Opinion of Course.
Randazza Legal Group Makes False Claims, as proven in the willful, wanton, deliberate with full knowledge of it's falsehood frivolous, invasive, rights violating legal actions against Crystal Cox, Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers, Desi Fox / Diana Grandmason and Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Inventor.
I say NO more Randazza Above the LAW.
Las Vegas based Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group uses the courts as his private play ground to bully those who dare to exercise their Free Speech rights and speak out about him, his "friends" and "associates", his law firm or his wife.
Marc Randazza does this while at the same time, PRETENDING, to advocate Free Speech for ALL.
Marc Randazza uses Protective Orders to get GAG ORDERS on those who exercise their First Amendment rights talking about him, or those who create a PARODY making fun of him. He does this while at the same time flat out lying that he is an advocate for the Free Speech rights of ALL.
Marc Randazza is certainly NOT for the First Amendment rights of Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers NOR of me, Crystal Cox.
Marc Randazza used an unconstitutional preliminary TRO's (alleged "Temporary" Restraining Orders"" to simply shut down massive blogs (speech) of mine and that "TEMPORARY" was well over 2 years now. He flat out misused the courts to STEAL intellectual property, STEAL search engine ranking, and suppress speech. He did this claiming Trademark rights. Yet they were clearly blogs that were "Gripe Site" and "Sucks Sites" of which he has previously defended.Marc Randazza not only STOLE my intellectual property, my search engine ranking, and violated my First Amendment rights but he used all my decades of work and proprietary knowledge against me pointing the servers illegally to a blog post on his blog and his buddies blogs lying about me, defaming me, falsely accusing me of criminal activity and ruining my real estate career, my quality of life, my online business and ALL because he did not APPROVE of the online "SPEECH" I was using in griping about him and his wife.
Marc Randazza files a protective order with the courts, files a civil suit then uses that to ATTACK his target. He is then an officer of the court and can pry into your private life as deep as he wants. He uses this power to harass your church, publicize your home address, get your bank and wire records, get your phone records, harass clients and customers, harass and bully ex's, constantly question you, have you followed and abuse the power of the courts to ruin your life, business and relationships.
Attorney Marc Randazza, who is allegedly connected to the mafia. Marc Randazza DOES protect the rights of pedophiles to write guides on pedophiles, does associate with and said to employ Sean Tompkins and Ari Bass (Michael Whiteacre) to bully, threaten, stalk, harass and put "real fear" into those who Marc Randazza does not like, Marc Randazza does talk about the death of his targets and he bullies, threatens, lies about, criminal defames his targets such as me and Alexandra Mayers. He does REAL STUFF to ruin lives, and yet he pretends he is the victim, scared of us and the courts, judges give him his way, give him an illegal and unethical protective order which he uses as a GAG ORDER and a way to suppress SPEECH and steal intellectual property.
Yet Attorney Marc Randazza claims to be afraid of a woman me, and another woman in a separate protective order, Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers and this fear is so bad he gets a protective order against us when he is the one that is breaking the law, bullying us, intimidating us, violating our rights and abusing the courts to do it.
Attorney Marc Randazza abuses the power of the courts, is above the law and the question becomes why? Why do Las Vegas judges give Marc Randazza super powers in the courts to abuse, stalk, bully, steal intellectual property, intimidate, threaten and all with the power of a TRO / a Protective Order that he gets the minute he asks based on his "STATED" fear or his STATED Trademark Violation. This is CLEARLY against the law but Attorney Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group's victims have NO RIGHTS in a COURT OF LAW. Only Mr. Randazza has rights and these rights violate the constitution of the United States and violate the LAW. Oh well Attorney Marc Randazza controls your courts and DOES NOT ABIDE BY THE LAW. That Fact sure seems to be clear to me.Las Vegas based Lawyer Marc Randazza falsely claims to be an advocate for Free Speech Rights for ALL and for the First Amendment Rights of ALL even pedophiles and even in the domain name GlenBeckRapedANDmurderedayounggirlin1990.com YET he suppresses the speech of those he does not like or approve of and he uses the power of the courts to do it.
Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claims to be a Trademark expert, he falsely advertises his expertise in this field, yet he FALSELY sued me, Crystal Cox, his former client claiming a Trademark violation against him, his wife, and his toddler. Randazza did this with willful and wanton intend to harass, bully, intimidate, cause harm and ruin the life of his target, in this case me, his former client Blogger Crystal Cox. Randazza either is NOT a Trademark Law expert or he is and he used that expertise to commit fraud on the court and sue a former client claiming a cause of action of Trademark Law of which he clearly had no legal rights.
Why? He did this in order to try and shut me up because I was exercising my free speech rights and First Amendment rights to have gripe sites against him, call his wife a slut and review his legal practice and law firm with sucks sites. Randazza STOLE those sites and blogs that were in the top 10 search for Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group and he used a protective order, a TRO to do it. No muss, No fuss; he says he is in fear and the courts simply give him his wish, it's MAGIC.
Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claims to be an expert in intellectual property law yet he did not own his Trademark nor his wife, nor child and sued me claiming he had a Trademark. Marc Randazza did not even own his name as a dotcom yet FALSELY advertised that he is a Domain Name expert.
Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group make False claims daily, yet for some reason they get away with it. Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group are not ethical, do not operate under the color of law as far as I see it and are unconstitutional. Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group have super powers in the courts, it seems, and are oddly protected by Judges across the United States and probably in other countries. And for some reason they still get away with their INJUSTICE.
I will soon be filing a DOJ and FBI complaint regarding all of these issues. As Soon as I can.
I BELIEVE it is against the law to make False Claims in Advertising.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/3729
Randazza makes fraudulent claim of being an advocate for ALL speech, False Claims of being a Trademark Expert and Intellectual Property Expert. In my Opinion of Course.
Randazza Legal Group Makes False Claims, as proven in the willful, wanton, deliberate with full knowledge of it's falsehood frivolous, invasive, rights violating legal actions against Crystal Cox, Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers, Desi Fox / Diana Grandmason and Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Inventor.
I say NO more Randazza Above the LAW.
Please Send tips to ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)